Member Info for HenryHistorian

Boom…..pfffffff…..air already gone out.

…and a CEO that cannot be trusted.

@warren: The problem right now is that the company has not been held to account and these investor presentations managed by the company don’t go deep enough.
Sorry trust needs to be earned abs right now none is left.

I don’t want a witch hunt I want a professional enquiry as there are enough aspects that stink here so I hope that Pallas/Hammodi bring this to court. If Tenner and others are innocent they have nothing to worry about.

@NGR: Right now we have neither the cherry nor the cake that Mr Tenner spoke of. With regard to his words do you really not think that they are a joke given the share price back then and now?

@Ecclescake: Or maybe you belong to the category of people who think that Brian meant that accepting a sim that halves the share price is “transformational” in a positive manner and was a “major inflection point” - oh how we now know how empty and hollow his words were.

@Ecclescake: We are all free to decide how to invest but I want to warn potential new investors.
I find it quite disappointing actually that some people just want to ignore that the CEO has systematically and intentionally misled investors- if you condone such despicable behaviour that is up to you.

@warren: I am a frequent poster here to warn unsuspecting potential new investors here not to invest in a company which CEO has over months misled private investors.
I also post here as I think there are some people like NGR who seem very very keen just to draw a big veil over the absolutely shameful outcome of the Samsung litigation and yes the misleading of investors by Brian Tenner.

Every CEO is replaceable including Brian Tenner. And as an investor I would prefer a CEO I can actually trust rather than a CEO that has thoroughly discredited himself.
With regard to the CEO we need someone with commercial acumen - not so sure about Brian in that regard given that he let Samsung off the hook for a pittance.

I opened it and closed the report within 1 minute… look Brian Tenner pulled the wool over my eyes but he did so only once.

Follow the RNS on commercial deals with clear details in it and don’t buy before. Too much ramping fluff had been put out by Nanoco in the past.

Not interested frankly. The only thing I trust concerning Nanoco are clearly written RNS announcing a commercial order.

Tornadotony: I guess now every client knows under what pressure Nanoco is and they can drive a hard hard bargain which means less profit to Nanoco shareholders.

@Valueformoney: I meant new investors. Those tied into this nightmare have now the unenviable decision to make whether to stay invested with a company that is led by a CEO of questionable moral judgment (I am being kind here in my phrasing) or whether to sell at a loss.

@NGR: Someone who has no argument left will resort to personal attacks.
Never mind hopefully Hammodi and Pallas will soon see you go into overdrive and Tenner leave the company. He has done enough damage and there must be enough managers around that can take his place…. It is not like that they have to step in big shoes anyway.

@Valueformoney: I am not saying influencing by putting out a certain recommendation but by being honest and transparent when talking to the analysts of Edison. I mean when Brian Tenner as a low base would have been happy to accept USD 50 million how can that be reconciled with the USD 200-250 million that Edison put out for lost US sales revenues and Edison pointing out that this is only one third of global revenues.
I am sure that the Edison analysts would have asked for the economic damage that Nanoco thinks it suffered and what a ballpark figure would be.
Sorry but I just don’t believe that between the Edison output in terms of factual content and figures and Nanoco that there is not a link.

Again I hope that Pallas and Hammodi bring this to court as this is really the only venue where one can hope for a proper resolution for all the troubling aspects of the year to date developments.

@NGR: I and many others would argue that it is by LETTING Brian Tenner remain in charge is what will threaten Nanoco.
I mean who is going to invest in a company where by a little of research they can find out that the CEO has misled investors? Who????
Brian Tenner has lost all credibility because he has shown no integrity.

@valueformoney: Believe it or not there are people who bought not just based on the Edison report but also based on what Brian Tenner was telling investors in presentations in 2021/2022.
Also just to remind you: Edison was paid for their research by Nanoco so whilst the report might be formally independent the input and information must surely also have come from conversations with Nanoco management? And here just my simple question: Why did Tenner never try to put balance on the USD 200-250 million that Edison wrote was lost by Nanoco just due to lost US revenues alone?
Surely Tenner knew very well what kind of impression and calculations that would lead to by investors…?
My impression remains very much that he has consciously misled investors over months and had enough time if he had wanted to to put a more realistic picture out there - which he so blatantly failed to do!

@NGR: There is the possibility of severe wrongdoing by management in the room. Wouldn’t you want this to be cleared up or do you want your money invested in a company led by a man whom some people think might be guilty of serious lapses in integrity and even criminal behaviour?
No the deal with Samsung is done and what a capitulation that has been - but I and others will not go away.
But good effort by you anyway - If Brian asks you whether you have defended him well you can certainly point to many posts today where your mantra seems to be “nothing to see here nothing to see…”

@GuardianAngel: BT looked and sounded super super confident “and off to trial it is”. I mean when does acting stop and acting becomes lying?
I mean the way it is portrayed now is that our resounding win at PTAB, the years of collaboration with Samsung, the email of Samsung reaching out to Nanoco didn’t exist at all - to be honest Brian Tenner bottled it badly and the question is now whether there has also been criminal dealings in play or not - again I am not in a position to say but this is really something that needs to be discussed in great detail in a court of law. Certainly the Pallas letter has set out enough points that need to be scrupulously addressed and answered.

Hm funny that the brigade “let’s look to the future and draw a big big veil on the past” is out there.
As to the argument that BT knows Nanoco I can tell you that every CEO is replaceable especially one that has misled a very large chunk of his investor base and basically has lost their trust and support.
It is almost like saying I don’t want a bully replaced in school as I know that this bully will only beat me up but not use a knife. If this bully gets expelled from school the next bully might even use a knife…
Not a great comparison but I trust people get what I am driving at.

So the legal small print in documents not easily/readily available to investors. Great investor communication…..
Again I ask how Brian Tenner could speak with a clear conscience about multiples of share price…
Anyway let’s vote him out so he cannot mislead private investors any longer.