RE: Execution of the hits/Ruth squad15 Jul 2022 00:56
SL, your position makes no logical sense whatsoever and (though I suspect you don't realise this) is a massive piece of double standards.
So... you and I have both come to a decision on ANGS as to its potential as an investment - but apparently only you should be allowed to post the reasons for your decision?
Or to look at it another way, you don't think I should post, because I claim (truthfully as it happens, but how would you know?) not to be holding shares any longer and my posts are much more wary. But you also object to equally wary posts from the likes of Mirasol, who claims to be a holder... so in point of fact, the only thing you're objecting to is any less than positive posts being made. And whether you know it or not, that's just an attempt to control the narrative.
Finally, I'd say your anger is entirely misplaced. I don't claim that "every company statement is a lie" - but I do point out the very many company statements that have been issued which turned out not to be true at all. It's the company that is the sole cause of this and it's solely the company that continues to provide ample evidence for my point of view..
You have said that none of this matters because it's all in the past (including the very recent past - there have already been two further delays to first gas announced in the last couple of weeks alone). But that's a viewpoint which cannot be made to stand up - you'll have heard the truism that "trust needs to be earned", so therefore track record is vital. You might as well say "Hey, don't bother trying to find out who burgled my house a couple of nights back, because that's in the past and we are where we are".
Sign In
Follow the stocks
