Member Info for HeadInTheSand

Well, given the SP is (again) at a 52 week low, I'm both delighted and relieved that I've consistently ignored your constant encouragements over the last several years to buy in, because ANGS was an alleged " guaranteed multi-bagger". I've clearly managed to dodge a bullet there.

Presumably given your repeated assurances of jam tomorrow, you're busy averaging down yet again, BV? That is, if you've ever believed your own assurances?

Data as a platform, as it happens

If only it were a penny share price...

As a 52 week low is reached (again), presumably the permanently uber-positive and fact-allergic heavenly choir are all rushing to average down (again) on this stellar opportunity?

I personally find the irredeemably uber-positive to be as distasteful as they are unrealistic (given the overweening weight of historical evidence as to whether anything that Amit claims is credible or not). However, having said that...

...it's all pretty much entirely irrelevant. All any genuine PI can do is wait and see if anything actually happens. There is literally no other choice. Probably not the greatest idea to go planning what one's going to spend any incoming funds on, though.

Again with your fairytales BV. You should get a job at ANGS, the rate you spin these. Mind you, easier than you facing up to facts, I suppose?

Anyhow, looking at the SP, surely it's about time for you tell us all you've averaged down yet again on this guaranteed banker, no?

Very obviously the only category of BB poster that still vociferously and unswervingly cheerlead for Amit.

I'm guessing that by "crap", BV must mean "things that are untrue"...

Here are some facts.

1. Over the last 30 days, daily production has averaged 72,740 therms, giving an expected average monthly total of under 2.2 million therms. A fair bit less than ANGS's most recent forecast of 2.7 million therms a month.

2. The first £3m junior loan plus eyewateringly high interest was as we know converted into shares - despite the company saying that it was choosing to take out loans because that was better for shareholders than diluting via placing (even though that's pretty much exactly what it did).

3. The second £6m junior loan becomes fully repayable in January. It remains to be seen if this will be repaid in cash or if ANGSA will again issue more dilutative confetti to clear this off the books.

4. Related to the above and giving ANGS the possibility to pay off that c £7m liability in cash next month, there has been no update on any replacement global financing, despite ANGS recently saying that this has become easier to negotiate.

5. All natural gas futures pricing is now sharply off higher levels of a month or two ago and now stand at sub 90p per therm.

All very easily verifiable facts, and not "crap", I'm afraid.

BV will of course be virulently allergic to these and so will be along as quick as his little legs can carry him with some playground insults, some made-up stuff and some other attempts to smokescreen...

Amit's shown himself many times to be a past-master at being quite deliberately unclear and vague for as long as he can get away with it.

"Shareholders are reminded that the process takes AROUND 5 weeks to complete."

I would draw attention to the word that I've capitalised (and you can bet your bottom dollar that the shills here will be leveraging that one shortly).

There's definitely no shortage of shills pretending to be genuine investors, that's for sure.

I see that the disingenuous here are by now really scraping the barrel with their made-up "they're all green activists!" myth.

Hardly a surprise. As to why the ramp squad claim that anyone with a less than positive view on UKOG is a Greta-worshipping XR member? That's crushingly simple to answer - it's because although facile, it's literally the only tactic available to them in their efforts to deceive.

They can hardly put forward any argument based on facts, can they? Because as anyone with an IQ bigger than their shoesize can see in a microsecond, every single piece of oh so easily verifiable factual evidence shows UKOG up as being an utter farce of an investment. So the likes of Insidious have to ignore all those and instead attempt to play the man, not the ball, when it comes to trying to discredit those posting fact-based realistic opinion.

Basically, the pompom wavers have to make stuff up... it's all they've got left.

Why do the ramp squad claim that anyone with a less than positive view on UKOG is a green activist? That's crushingly simple to answer - it's because although facile, it's literally the only tactic available to them in their efforts to deceive.

They can hardly put forward any argument based on facts, can they? Because as you point out, every single piece of oh so easily verifiable factual evidence shows UKOG up as being an utter farce of an investment. So they have to ignore all those and instead attempt to play the man, not the ball, when it comes to trying to discredit those posting fact-based realistic opinion.

Basically, the pompom wavers have to make stuff up... it's all they've got left.

To be fair, nowhere near as much of a joke as your frankly banal attempts at zero evidence ramping.

Now those do raise a smile...

Only two???

A new low for Ocelot... doubleteaming with Adrian Mk 34,276 in the ongoing attempts to polish the unpolishable.

"...no more deramping angles left..."

You're so right, BV. As you have been screeching at the top of your little lungs for several years now, ANGS is a litany of unbroken positives with not a single cloud on the horizon or fly in the ointment. Anywhere. At all.

(Possibly his most deranged comment so far - though there are a lot of others vying for that not exactly proud title).

As for "deramping", I am still unsure how referring to simple and oh so easily verifiable facts can possibly be viewed as deramping? Your own fact-free 'jam tomorrow' assurances? Now when it comes to the genuine stakes, they're very different...

Apologies Helx... I hadn't spotted that you and Dagenham were so similar.

Seems to have become more stable, but the new average productions is now apparently sub 80,000 therms a day.

"...when he delivers..." A not at all subtle assumption there, n'est-ce pas?

I think you'll find that's it's still very much a big, fat "if".

I'm pretty sure that honesty would be most holders' first choice for the virtue that Amit himself should try adopting for a change.