RE: Twin tracking13 Apr 2022 23:47
'It has to be said, though, that the copper grades have not been particularly startling, so that I, personally, have revised downwards my (admittedly back of fag-packet) estimated of the value'
Possibly the 'MasterInvestor' lacks Porphyry knowledge?! Pretty much, all of the assays have shown commercial grades and are very much in line with other, similar, systems (or even better in some cases). Or perhaps we are all dreaming?! (Didn't CB actually state he'd tell AA to sling their hook if an offer of 10p came in?)
The bigger concern I have is the volume at RC. Despite what Bird was saying a few months back, and based on released RNS's, I still have us @1.5-1.8MT. (admittedly, the 'fag packet calcs' some of us are doing/posting can change a lot based on basic inputs, especially the homogeneity - Even their own model, in some areas more than others, will interpolate between sections).
He's still stating a range of 500-700MT (I'm sure he knows full well by now) and I feel we really need to be closer to 700MT volume to hit the target.
Yes, Ascot may get us over 2MT but Bird is on record stating we have reached that in RC alone, although he's not so keen to mention this of late.
Will someone buy it? Or will it be a big misunderstanding when the final CU values are released? - I'm still pretty confident in the former or I'd have sold up however, experience with Mr.Bird tells me is that it's just not going to be straight forward!