RE: Andrada video5 Mar 2026 15:27
Yea TDT the put options was the bit that no one liked, and i think that goes someway to explaining the Luke warm market response to the news.
Clauses ii&iii being the concerning ones , and specifically the hidden unknown detail behind clause ii.
In all honesty i think we just have to be optimistic that this is never triggered , as some of the investment looks like its being spent already on videos haha.
in defence of AVs pants being pulled down, i think we entered into this venture from a really weak negotiating position, likely that talks started when the company as whole looked in a far more perilous position than i would assess it to be in today, with each passing month generating some operating cash.
I suspect this was the best offer that was forth coming, and in essence there was a binary option:
1. Take funding now, with clauses and caveats due to the companies value and fiscal position.
OR
2. Try to improve the companies balance sheet , and wait to further prove BW from internal funding in FY27 whilst cash generative.
Now i feel that if the company started CAP EX on BW now from its own operating cash, we would be more alarmed with that than the put option.
Clearly having in recent months entered a phase of being cash generative FY 27 and likely 28 need to be about consolidating the financial position , and developing UiS.
The only way to drive BW forward in the next year or two was a JV and that has come with caveats and clauses does not surprise me, for that to be convertible at 3p isnt ideal, but that is a factor of our weakness at the time of the deal. The Put option may very well become irrelevant, good drilling or tailing results at BW could make converting BWCAM's stake into stock completely unthinkable, but i see the risk of 300M new shares being issued as discomforting if it is triggered.
Lets review this PUT Option issue TdT once the first set of BW results are published, then we can decide how negative or nelglible those clauses are.
GD