Member Info for ghin

Keith needs to be fired. Don't forget to vote now if you haven't yet. As a minimum, we should dip his "aye" percentage as a warning shot.

He still hasn't demonstrated intelligence beyond what the approximation of that would be by a LLM, but he demonstrated consistency at posting at a similar frequency of a sentence or two at a time, exclusively some contextual but shallow regurgitation of something negative.

Not me. I'm sure even Leonbot agrees with that.

I'm sure "you" have.

Oh, hi bot. I'm sure this has nothing to do with manipulating the price down to load up for the next uptrend :)

Whatever you think the price needs to be, it'll be based on macro forecasts. I'm doubtful it'll be higher than PFS to stay on the safe side when going to get financing. The PI pleasing NPVs are irrelevant when it's all about getting the money to go ahead and selling out cheap to "friends".

My guess is 17k.

Whether the DFS will cause a sustained increase in SP depends on the details. What carbonate price? What OPEX? Get it too conservative, and the NPV simply won't be appealing in the light if the risks. Get it too ambitious, and you'll lose credibility in your ability to secure finance and offtakes.

Ah, the morning bot post of the day. We all need something constant in our lives. The person running it needs cancer.

And what a meaningful volume. Oh, wait... It's actually a contra-indicator.

However, EMH, thus the 49% of said project, can be bought out cheaply, hence the concern. Can happen by CEZ, or someone else. That controlling stake is not really a problem, 49% and the shareholder agreement falling into any possible new owner should be enough to throw a lot more weight around than what KC does.

Look whose here with another bombastic thread, claiming the opposite of the CEO without a shred of evidence.

Now KC is not exactly trustworthy, but more so than you.

At least not so that there would be enough evidence.

Doesn't sound like that.

Very credible poster, somehow getting the itch every few days to start a new bombastic thread with a bombastic post with zero fact based arguments to substantiate the fixation on negativity so far.

Looks like we'll rise boys! :D

Well, there's certainly point where it's worth questioning whether some of the posters here would pass the Turing test or not.

Impressive, might take more than half a day to reach this sophistication after all. Good job!

It's more likely to be a sophisticated bot than a mentally ill person.

I could build something like that in about a half day with chat gpt... We'll see more of these.

Because it's probably a bot and less likely a mentally damaged troll. :)