RE: Doc jones30 May 2021 15:51
Hi Gilt, I agree Doc tends to get carried away with his projections. For someone who talks about 'data' and 'research' he should know the market rarely values a company in line with their resource base or 'potential'. Having said that his research i.e. not projections, is pretty solid imo. And I do believe with a f/o and some drilling success we will break 30p. But that's 12-18 months from now and requires poo and gas to stay near current levels.
Tony, you asked me what I think of EMO. Have to say that it does look very interesting wrt potential resource size and it's near surface so relatively easy to mine (pending more drill results). But it's very early in its cycle and needs a lot more proof to support some of Doc's assertions of 20x. It has some historical drill results, otherwise it's all trenching and rock chip samples. These things are often bull**** and used to attract early investment for drilling. Granted this is different due to some historical drill results, which are impressive. Plus it's a prolific area. There's also the benefit of EU funding (in the distant future). But there's a hell of a lot of drilling and money to be raised before they get to a PFS, let alone a DFS, for just one of the resources Doc talks about. And the $5m they have in the bank won't go far when it comes to proving anything other than a potentially economic deposit exists. This means they need to raise more in the near future, or find a partner at an early stage to pay for the drilling and feasibility studies. So I'm going to stick with my earlier point about it being very early in the cycle, valued quite high at the moment for what is currently known, and there's a lot of money to be raised before they have any real idea of the resource size. From my experience these stocks are all about timing. If you timed it before doc started his coverage then you've 3x and there's no downside risk until the drill results are released. After drill results are released it may double, but they still wouldn't have anywhere near enough assays to have a solid idea of resource size and overall economics. So at the end of the drilling campaign they will need to raise again, regardless of success or not. I doubt PIs will get to participate in said raise if initial drilling is successful, but Eric Sprott probably will get to wet his beak. In the distant future the mcap could end up 5x current (over Β£300m), but there's so much time and money to be spent before this happens. And depending on how many shares they need to print over this time period (and raise price) the return could only be 2-3x from current sp. In summary, it is super early stage and already valued more than i3e, which is operating, profitable, has more cash in the bank, pays a dividend plus has substantial upside with the drill bit and f/o. And any discoveries can be brought online within months. So if I had a spare Β£100k I'd stick it in i3e, or hzm, or eml, or acp, or ars. AIMHO