RE: Majid doing the Rounds25 Jun 2021 16:16
Hi Tony, problem with using broad metrics like value of metal in the ground is it doesn't take into account AISC. No point having a lot of metal in the ground if it's uneconomical to extract. Solg is an example of where the value of metal in the ground is monstrous across all their acreage, but so is the cost to get it out of the ground. The reason why I said initially the project looks really promising, but it's all about 'timing', is the amount of work, time and money that needs to be invested to prove up the various mineralized systems. They're very early stage and although there's a ton of money to be made getting in early on these plays when timed correctly (e.g. SOLG, GGP), they can often also pull back a long way with each round of funding. Thing is, it doesn't matter whether I think it's over-valued at any point in time, it's about what the market thinks. A lot of these plays get mega hyped, which results in massive disconnects with their peers given their life-stage e.g. 88e. This of course hasn't stopped people making a ****load on GGP, SOLG, 88e etc by having big b@lls and playing the market.
Fact is they haven't even started turning drills in order to prove up a lot of Doc's assertions. Historical assays help, but as I've said there's 10,000's metres that need to be drilled on each target to get to PFS and DFS. That's years away, even if they fast track an individual project. Agree it's a great company to make money up to 70c, but after this I wouldn't put in money until I see a lot more assays, and certainly post the next fund raise. There's lots of mining companies that have a trading history showing huge peaks (early exploration) followed by sharp and steady declines over the following 5-10 years (proving up / fund raising). I missed the boat anyway so don't really have a choice in the matter if I was to invest. I wish everyone else the best of luck in this company, but given what I know for sure, there's not enough to justify the share price (imo).