RE: Shareholder Returns v Peers28 Oct 2021 15:33
All good points Tony regarding the industry. I also agree that O&G is the best place to be for the next 12-24 months. Safe and easy money.
However, why talk of i3e performance over the past 12 months? Why not the past 3 years? Or 5 years? Not everyone got free warrants like Graham. So for many, you included, the total return on their investment isn't that great. And it doesn't take much digging to find O&G companies that have tripled or more over the past 12 months. We haven't because of the confetti shares and warrants they issued. They need to do a few things now in the interest of the sp (their PI base), rather than themselves (and IIs). What many on here have pointed out would be a good place to start. They get paid outrageous salaries for the size of the company, and bonuses are triggered for not really doing much. They should invest some of that money back into the company they run, rather than continuing to give themselves hand-outs. They need to put our fcf to work, either by ploughing it into production (we've heard very little on this), share buy-backs, or even announce a 30-40% dividend payment for H2. All of these things will give the sp a kick.
They know the mega raise has f@cked the sp. They should be doing more to fix this, rather than talking about value disconnects. But above all, they need to show investors like you and me they actually want to drive the sp rather than taking great salaries and lots of cheap shares for themselves. The other benefit of a higher Mcap is of course the ability to access debt for growth, or a higher amount of money (for shares issued) if they do part debt : raise for another acquisition. The market looks at companies like Kistos and how their bod's interests are aligned with all investors, and just don't see it with our bod. They have made mistakes, but to date the only group that have really paid for them are PIs. Time for them to give a bit back and stop being so greedy for themselves and their banker mates.