RE: Valuation11 Nov 2021 10:13
nomadic, I'm not sure what you're expecting from this f/o, but I'd be genuinely surprised if we get anything more than 1 free carried drill, which I believe mgt have pointed to in recent interviews. So value of circa $20m from memory. The remaining 2-3 drills will be paid in part by us. If we retain 50% ownership then we pay 50% of the cost of the remaining drills. So we'd still have to pay a reasonable sum of money. But equally we'll be valued at far less in the success case.
Reality of our situation is we're now back in the 11's, and there's very little in the near future to get us anywhere near our undervalued peers except for the f/o. As per Tony's workings we should be valued nearer 20p, just to be in-line with the average Canadian producer who no doubt has more debt, less 2P reserves, & no major exploration upside (e.g. Serenity). Important to note that debt isn't a factor for under-valuation unless the market sees it as something the company cannot manage. Indeed debt can add value if it's providing strong growth upside, and is manageable. I'd say that 100m recoverable barrels of Brent in this market would represent incredible upside. In fact I'd go as far as saying that we'd be valued closer to 50p this time next year if this was proven, and we retained full ownership. This is where our Canadian production really comes into play as it will finance whatever we retain of this field, whilst supporting our hand in negotiations that would probably involve majors.
Imo there is no way $50m debt will ever break the company, but what it will do is provide a significant re-rate in value just on announcement alone. This will increase into the drilling program. And if we prove up anything near or exceeding 50m recoverable barrels then we're suddenly trading in the 30's, rather than still languishing in the teens in another year. I also believe we're fast approaching a 'use it or lose it' scenario due to environmental pressure. So I for one would rather they roll the dice on it now. They have already made a discovery, so it's hardly wild-catting in the area. Plus I'm sure they learned a few lessons from the last failure / success that played out.
Fwiw I prefer the f/o scenario, but if this isn't going to happen in the next 8 weeks I'm happy for them to go it alone. I'd also be happy for them to do a raise further down the line at a much higher sp to limit some of the debt taken on. My position is they should get on with it. I'm very happy for them to put a relatively small, manageable amount of risk onto our books in a booming market, for the huge upside potential. AIMHO GLA