Member Info for fulmar29

@Eloro,I dont have a problem with anyone expressing a view that "dampens sentiment" as that is the nature of discussion and
healthy debate. Personal,vitriolic and slanderous abuse is a different matter.Given the fact that the poster in question has stated he will sell and leave this share at 4p,then it's only a temporary situation. Now back to business please.

Nice article Troajan "The bank forecast a return of about 27% over a 12-month period on the S&P/Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI), with a 19.2% return for precious metals, 40.1% for energy, " I think its today that the Chinese metal exchange goes live on Copper ,I wonder why ? With the growth predicted ,and Majors trading their own commodities it could be a bumpy (upward) ride.

@Eloro,I can't be bothered to go over the past,but anyone who tries to manipulate and mislead others in order to make money for themselves ,deserves the description. The BoD and many others do not deserve the past abuse that has been dished out to them and many good and knowledgeable posters no longer post on this site because of that individual, I personally ,refuse to be manipulated and bullied by a malicious ,self serving individual. For a taste of the past look at 555s post below.
With regards to the lack of assays,I believe there is a strategic reason which will become apparent in the near future (even imminent )

Nah,just an old parasite !

Yes Ortus, some entertainment.

Tickled me Banksy

and equally Peggy,you are "in it" for yourself, not ARCM. So what's your point ?

How lovely and genuine that PC listened,and realized the message was lost,so corrected it. Lots of credit to a genuine honest guy. If he makes this happen it's going to be huge.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/china-derivatives-copper/update-3-china-to-launch-long-awaited-international-copper-futures-on-nov-19-idINL4N2HE2LQ -

@Eima- there's an RNS booked for tomorrow morning-NVS has bought 100 shares @5p-not sure why ??? :-))

I wonder when the market will catch on.The merest mention of finding silver or gold bearing sulphides is enough to propel some shares into orbit,and the fact that SRES is going to be able to finance future exploration and development through CE profits is staggeringly overlooked. "You can take a horse to water,but you can't make it re rate a company"

AAL aren't going to change their MO,and part ownership is what they do. (In Chile, we have interests in two major copper operations: a 50.1% interest in the Los Bronces mine, which we manage and operate, and a 44% share in the Collahuasi mine; we also manage and operate the El Soldado mine and Chagres smelter (50.1% interest in both). In Peru, we have a 60% interest in the Quellaveco project (approved for development in 2018).So for me it's do they already have a partner they want to share our sites with ? or would they need more detailed proof (for their BoD and shareholders)in order to justify the NvS asking price so buy a small percentage with first dibs /options a further purchase .Either way it's going to be a wake up call for a sleepy market wondering why they didn't see something right under their noses.

@Peggy- they could't afford me :-)) p.s this advert is a while old but our Conf. Agr. is as well ,and it looks like AAL may well have advertised for someone to explore now and in the future. If we sold with a huge unexplored potential then "exploration upside "would need just that. Just me following breadcrumbs as a wise man/cat once said.

Interesting that there is no mention of the contract length, as there is on many other AAL job vacancies.Maybe a permanent long term contract , https://www.google.com/search?q=anglo+american+zambia+jobs&rlz=1C1ZKTG_enGB926GB926&oq=anglo+american+zambia&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3j0i22i30l3j69i60.19350j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&ibp=htl;jobs&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiIsOPypIDtAhWKUcAKHdjDAmcQkd0GMAB6BAghEAE#fpstate=tldetail&htivrt=jobs&htiq=anglo+american+zambia+jobs&htidocid=hy-U5CFhq3yk5gXHAAAAAA%3D%3D&sxsrf=ALeKk00AgDp28IqWOLZTxmQhGGB-iayNQg:1605296880940

I would be very surprised,even amazed if Nick accepted having terms dictated to him by MEDR. He will be negotiating (poss something like Casa retention if shares dip too far,or part share part cash) and would either strike a decent deal or say "no thank you",and take Casa back and sell it to A N Other. GLA

The point being Graham ,if they had not found enough to satisfy their needs,they wouldn't have moved on after so few drills.The question of how much we spent last year would not reflect accurately as we paid for some drilling via equity.

@Yezzerrr- http://s2.q4cdn.com/256050873/files/doc_presentations/2020/11/201109-Arc-Minerals-Presentation-NOV-2020.pdf
7.15 in--- and as I said if AAL were not happy with results proving up a decentresource at Fwiji we would not be moving on.To have done such few drills @ Fwiji over such a large area,I don't think it is stretching the imagination of AAL too much to realize what they (and we)are looking for is there.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MZXgIJM7Dss Extrapolation DW,

I think he used the term "moved on" in the J.Indaba pres (7.15 in).I remember it because I was surprised there was no comment afterwards on the boards

I absolutely love a project where the ancilliary minerals/ tailings pay for the capex .And then given that these are tailings already makes it ridiculously profitable