Member Info for fulmar29

That TSP is absolutely priceless-firstly we had NvS facilitating"insider Trading" then yesterday we could raise monies needed against the Kalaba"plant" and now he's got cast iron knowledge "insiders dumping" -Stand aside NvS-the new CEO is here LMFSO

because it's my own guesstimates/theories/supposition with a bit of logic/ observation and that sort of guesswork IMO is not helpful on BBs

If they don't have an option YES,if they see the LT benefit in an equity purchase and it effectively costs them nothing overall , after proving up the various licenses ,and they are able then to involve A N other major (their M.O.) which would cover all their initial costs and more, YES again.They may try and "swallow it up" but that would be closer to a hostile T/O and the costs will reflect that . Of course if they make a soppy offer NvS would have to agree,but I feel there is a lot of history and communication between the various parties and it's all been amicable-So Far.But before the agreement I feel there is more news incoming that won't do us any harm. (not elaborating here) GLA

Aprog -I'm obviously a gambler or I wouldn't be here, and I would bet my last penny on NvS ( and therefore Arcm and it's shareholders) not losing control .

Not wishing to put a damper on peoples hopes and aspirations here , and although I think a deal is nailed on,there is IMO a greater chance of AAL buying part of Arc than all of it.So the price will go up on it's announcement but not as much as a full sale would produce.On the up side,Arc and AAL will then drill the nuts out of the site (and the sp will rise accordingly) for Arc to sell on to AALs preferred partner at a later date (at a much higher price than could be achieved now) Just my take,and if I'm wrong I will admit it when I can drag myself away from counting the money.

can we keep the language clean please -- "TOSH " outrageous ! :-))

But then again Westie we all know all MPs are full of c r ap

How are stop losses triggered if it doesn't go negative ? stop losses (which I hate) would generally be set to a level 5/10 or 20% below mid-so how have they been triggered? or am I missing something

This might help you Camkite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVMkUzxiMCo for anyone who cant be arsed opening it,it's understanding English.

The MMs would have been desperate to get hold of this and drop it from yesterday (as they always try to do on AIM.i.e creating liquidity LOL) but it looks like the buying pressure is too great for the parasites to benefit.But be assured they will drop this at some point and all those with stop losses on an AIM share will learn a painful lesson.This has got legs so don't let the MMs chop yours from under you,-lose the stop losses.GLA

Agreed and both parties will be itching to get drilling as quickly as possible,to add significant value to the joint investment.It's only going to take confirmation of one Tier 1 asset or discovery of another one to make the commercial agreement valuations (whatever that might be) look tame.

Wow ! Sta60-I bet you'd like to see £1.60 again ? I didn't realize it was Vass who took the initial stake.

@Tricky-from where you were it took insight and nerve to commit to something you had seen slide away for so long.Hat off to you, and with an average around 5 you will be fine IMO-Well done F29

Out of interest Trick.,what made you think it was worth averaging down last year ? and do you know your average now ? GL

I think you are all doing yourselves a disservice.I am an ARC and JAN holder and both projects speak for themselves.Both need a bit more time,but the JAN figures (pointed out by Dcat and Swizz) more than justify a massive rise in the sp,even from speculative investors.I don't really want JAN to accelerate yet as my ARC play has not unfolded(it's a year behind schedule) but on it's own merits it will thrive.

I agree with you James about not getting too carried away,but please remember it was the usually conservative NvS who uttered the now famous 0/10/20 multiples. Admittedly he was probably seeing that as a longer term project after more of the areas had been proved up. I don't do top estimates on BBs but had said from my first investment here that the minimum I envisaged was zero or 18p -that has now decently increased (the 18p bit). GLA

Totty -would you care to expand on that ?

the 10/20 or nothing was nov 2019 sp @ 3.5 but nevertheless it still multiplies nicely-beats 6p Eh Graham :-))

But for that money you would do mine Westie :-))

No sharepliks,you changed the heading because you had it proven to you that your statements were garbage,and now you try and think it will be forgotten (just like someone else on here used to do) .Your latest comments are just a progression of your dumb earlier statements. However your sage words "it's not done till it's done" will live with me forever as some of the wisest I have ever heard.