Member Info for fulmar29

Apro-no warrants is a key change of our last couple of placings-stronger demand to get into Arc.

1.8 raised that was bloody quick-someone wanted in,at that price

I'll have a word Baggy, and ask why they would even think about being impolite to someone accusing them of "dodgy dealings" How dare they !-And before anyone on here is impolite about someone accusing the BoD of "dodgy dealings" in their first post on this company ,and accuses Baggy of being a "deramping chancer" ,please examine the evidence first-OK-you're right he's a numpty.

I agree Fuku something definitely is (and it's not just 12")

well I saw a few twists coming but not that one, but within that RNS there is -"and may be applied to increase the Company's stake in the Company's Zamsort asset, subject to negotiations and commercial agreement." seems interesting

The following might be blindingly obvious to a few LTHs here ,but in a nutshell NvS joined this company as a NED (2017) and soon became D&EC- at that time we owned a minority stake in a little known (to most) Zambian copper exploration license and from day 1 ,he has been increasing that stake and reducing other liabilities.We are now the majority shareholder of possibly the biggest , best and maybe the most valuable copper exploration play in the world With copper shortages looming and record prices predicted and forecast by all the industry majors. , through all of that he has made sure that the regulated processes (for our safety) have been adhered to ,and allowed loyal interested parties to participate in the growth of the company,therefore ensuring a scenario that it was impossible for a third party "to sneak in through the back door".Why did he choose ORTAC/Arc ? because he had previous experience of the licenses with AAL ,and he knew he could gain CONTROL, and why would he put so much thought, money and effort into project if he wasn't pretty sure of the returns ???????. I'm either a stalker or I know a good deal when I see one ! GLA LTH

@Peggy it's not often that I would say "you have hit the nail on the head " but " I would think they want to be in charge here and to do that they need to buy the lot. " is on the money literally-AAL want control NvS is in control and for them to gain control annd sell on a % to a partner as is their M.O. will mean they deal with the temporary owner until it is proved up further.They can't take us out, and their BoD would not sanction a silly bid now @Kully-I had not thought about an extended EA after a deal, but it makes perfect sense for them to want it .If it's allowed.

Peggy ,you didn't have to write all that just the first few words would have done "I like you Fulmar" but I agree Arc investment is not just for a quick buck,long term will be the full gain,and as for "Dont set your expectations to high Fulmar"-
I have been invested here now for several years and believe I have my finger on the pulse,to the point where I have the biggest investment of my life riding on knowing what the parameters will be.So my worst possible scenario is just above your 25p and best possible an awful lot higher.A few twists to come before we start to get the effects of drills.

I hope you have higher expectations in other things in life Peggy as that is an absolute "fire sale giveaway"

https://www.mining.com/web/trafigura-sees-green-copper-supercycle-driving-prices-to-15000/ this is going to get silly.

I just do bed an Isa,is there a better way ?

@Lantier-I am going to be transferring more into my ISA in April

But plenty more news (twists) incoming before the drill season begins.Listen to the last IC for just one of them IMO.Remembering NvS does not ever say things in a business environment without there being a reason.

@sta,not a million miles off my upper calcs- drill results supporting of course.And thanks for changing the subject :-))

M-T you remind me of a boring drunk in a pub who starts a conversation with a dumb claim and decides to try and justify his claim all night long, you have posted nothing that can or ever will make "Deliberate Market Manipulation" either legal or a course of action that a major player would undertake.Have another drink in the corner as there are investors here with serious stakes that could do without hypothetical garbage .

Major-Tom-you said "Tired of this back and forth. Exactly why I don't usually post on BBs. Good luck to you both. Wish you every success". And then you come back with more hypothetical dodgy dealings Your scenario is "Manipulation" AAL would not risk 1.Losing a deal 2.getting caught out at a later date 3.Being seen to do it in the market place as no one would ever trust them in a deal again -it's illegal,and as a compliance officer has confirmed "Deliberate Manipulation"- If they bought in 2.5% through nominees before they did a deal no problem,if they did it to sell and affect the sp whilst dealing -guess what !
Now please stick to your previous statement, as your persistence with your illegal conspiracy theory is making you look lame.

Major-Tom,I agree with Lantier- your breath definitely smells. The main manipulator here is the MMs in the name of "liquidity" lol,but any suggestion of AAL doing so is total carp-

My eye !

would that not be confusing Blood? Multi Blood groups,bleeding obvious really :-)))

it's not that I have a problem with it,I just don't want to dilute my efforts any further and have no FOMO-so I wish them well and hope we all do well,because the main show in town -Arc-is what really matters.