So, Frances (Mrs T) received a warning from LSE admin this week. States she will stay on point and yet there continues a barrage of posts.
Holding 100 shares surely means this poster would be better to contact EUA as opposed to clogging up this board. Just my opinion.
Very simple Scuba.
You are the one to state a poster is incorrect. I have no evidence to help my understanding, but I thought 'hey this knowledgeable poster, must have picked up information that I do not have to state someone is correct.
I was just asking but you just resort to your abusive self so I will assume you don't have any facts to back your statement and just being a knob, as usual.
Bye CTC.
Aubery,
I agree with you 100% about the communication. Very poor however, regardless on whether they update on the WUP, I doubt very much they are going to ignore it.
However, there is no evidence of the process Mrs T is describing is actually happening and in my opinion is scare mongering. Mrs T stated she received a warning and I presume this is from LSE admin. I wonder what the reason or behaviour was to warrant this.
Mrs T,
The fact nothing has been communicated by EUA does not mean nothing has happened but for evidence of balance, if the company (EUA) just bury their heads which I suspect they will not, they deserve the decision of the judge, whatever that is.
And from another website :
Immediate actions
A company’s immediate concern is usually to prevent the petitioner from advertising the winding up petition.
This might be done by immediately paying the petition debt and the petitioner’s costs in full, or negotiating a settlement of the debt.
If all or part of the petition debt is disputed, the company should consider asking the petitioner to undertake not to advertise the petition, or at least without giving reasonable prior notice to the company. If no undertaking is given, it may be prudent to apply to the court for an injunction to restrain advertisement of the petition.
Fact - we do not know what discussions/actions are going on between the 2 parties but EUA did RNS to say they hope to come to an amicable agreement to avoid further legal action.
Scotty,
I don't think you are consoling Mrs T. Mrs T states she has lost a six-figure sum with EUA and hence the anger. If it all goes Pete Tong, I won't be in that position but if the BOD achieves the objectives, well that will great news especially for those who hold the shares.
Genuine posters, I did say, CTC/Scuba/BFL would eventually reply with his normal aggressive style and rudeness. It is consistent with all his monikers.
Only one moniker and you really don't know me BFL and that I am glad of.
No need to reply to Mrs T, her posting history is enough to speak for itself. Interesting the other boards and not TG, view of the Queeld set up.
Have a great day.
So because she is a woman, she can abuse and threaten people.
I offered sincere and kinds words to Toffers and she turned on me and even called me the nomad. Works both ways Spike.
This is not a threat, but some of the words Toffer posts on here could get them in serious trouble. Not from me I hasten to add.
Let’s leave it there for the night or it will turn into the Friendly spike show. 👍
Spike, get over yourself. No spin, all I said was less is more.
I don’t care how often or what she posts, the halo will slip but she is consistently telling investors to sell and her understanding of law is outdated as clarified by my KC client.
Well, the share certificate court case starts next week. Interesting what was commented on the ADVFN board.
Queeld is a company is the Caribbean that is a shareholder in EUA. It was owned by a chap who defrauded Alphabank Moscow and Alpha froze it after this chap transferred ownership to a lady friend in Moscow. Some arty lady.
Speak tomorrow Spike, sleep well 😴
Spike,
You keep talking to your friend on ADVFN.
Shame you (the bears/negheads) don’t give the investors space to discuss their investment.
I will acknowledge you calling out Toffers (less is more) but you still have an agenda.
Nite all.
Spike,
Perhaps it has changed but I left when one of the main contributors was uncovered as an ex convict. Stealing from charities, no remorse just sickened my stomach.
Shape it however you like. People get accused of ramping on this board but there is a difference of being found guilty and having to spend time with HMP.