RE: Worth a read-re.Arbitration!!!22 Aug 2018 13:16
Useful to know re: your suggestion of $5million only being needed. My instinct was (and still is) that much more would be needed, as the shorters would intensify their activity in the face of a short squeeze and borrow stock from institutions to keep the game alive, but I'm not knowledgable about the mechanics of it.
Perhaps the lack of a buy-back programme is a signal from ACA that they don't think there is value in doing so or at least we can say they think there is more value in holding cash? Not sure. I would personally keep as much in cash to weather any other setbacks and be conservative, should any other unforseen problems turn up.
Agreed that 50/50 isn't a terrible model and allows enough to reinvest capital into other projects, but the lack of resolution doesn't seem to stop the Chinese investing into Tanzania regardless. Agree that it has somewhat subdued investment, but its certainly not killing off inflows, disappointingly, as that would really ratchet up the pressure on the TGov!
I wonder in all this how all the unemployed people direct and indirect feel about it. Haven't seen news of any protests. "What do we want. A SMELTER" When do we want it" NOW" :-:::-))