Member Info for FlyingHigher

It's odd that KGH has gone up so much and DWF remains unchanged, but for how much longer?

That's true tornadotony, but Nanoco also don't have a viable business.

Am I all alone here? Surely time for takeoff soon? :D

Obviously there won't be anything from display. This was one of the reasons I lost confidence. Brian Tenner attempted to talk up display prospects, when Samsung now has free access to produce CFQDs with a mature production line.
Do you really think somebody else will now inquire about the prospect of licensing our tech to compete with Samsung?
That's doomed to fail.
The only reason display was mentioned was to give the impression that the deal had commercial benefits. It absolutely didn't. It killed display, but we now have a total of £77m.
If sensing fails, we're essentially a shell. Might as well divi up the money, sell the IP, factory and call it a day.

I don't understand why KGH has popped slightly and DWF has remained in doldrums.
Both great buys and DWF is now ridiculously cheap!

He orchestrated the rebirth of the freak show, quite rightly consigned to the history books, then it emerged the whole thing was fake, like some twisted soap opera pantomime. What a guy.
Anyway, apparently this was a share forum.
Mind you, I can hardly point at others for taking the chat off topic.
Another day, a new low is hit..... a bit like the Jerry Springer show.

4p paid this afternoon! It shouldn't be too long until 5p is paid. I'm expecting near 8p on the next results.

More buying early on, which is good to see.
It's still a great entry price

This will really kick on when volumes increase.
Not many shares in circulation.

Wow this reiterates the incompetence of Brian Tenner and the Nanoco BoD, all of whom should be sacked immediately.
People can't try to gloss over the awful outcome when another company has shown what's possible. In fact, several companies have done substantially better than Nanoco in the past and for cases that didn't have as high potential damages.
The share are valued at less than cash at the moment, which is ridiculous as I keep saying.
Chartists will avoid and wait for 12p for a good trade.

Target price just shy of 8p for starters.
I'm confident of a good week here.

I think this may be about to take off.
They have loads of cash, seriously undervalued at £4m and like others have said definitely £10m for starters. It could get very exciting here in the near future. Load up and hold!

Cash position is a little more than 22p per share.
From the interim results.
"Previously announced IP sale and license agreements: gross proceeds of £124.3m ($150.0m) with net proceeds after costs of £71.4m (c.$90.0m)"
£6m in cash.
Sure the cash is split over 2 years.
The cash burn is £1.1m per year, so you could subtract 2 years of cash burn at £2.2m.
75.2/322 = 23.35p
Then for valuation, add Runcorn at approximately £10m and the IP/business, which is extremely difficult.
For the market to value the business at less than £85m for starters is clearly ridiculous. That would be 26.46p, however the chart is absolutely dire and people are really ticked off with Nanoco.

I'll be happy to accept I'm wrong if sensing or display reaches profitable commercialisation

OK, how is the IP validation of any benefit to Nanoco (as is claimed by the board) if they've sold it to Samsung for peanuts?
How is it possible (as claimed by the board) that this could open up new business opportunities?

NGR1616 - you're joining Mike and Brian in the ranks of experts of obfuscation, but your attempts to mask the failures of Nanoco are very hollow for the astute long suffering holders here.
There's no conceivable way that even you can spin a retained settlement of $90m as in line with previous governance, given the fact that $85m of that for was the IP sale, for which you now claim the validation to be transformational.
This is absolute nonsense. The IP has been validated for Samsung! Nanoco are left with no value other than cash, Runcorn and whatever the sensing business may hold.
They'd never make it in Display even if they hadn't 'sold' their IP because Samsung's ability to leverage their IP for free renders Nanoco redundant anyway. You think other companies are going to enter the market with a few years left on the patents, buy Nanoco licenses and attempt to compete with a massive fish like Samsung? That's not feasible!

Nanonano did you feel confident about all the other deals Nanoco were going commercial with in the past?
Mike and Brian were very clear that the litigation was the focus and talked a out Nano even becoming an IP shell to pursue further lucrative litigation, then they settled for the worst deal possible and now the focus has changed.
They're trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
The sensing business has no proven value.
It's basically over at this point.
Sack the board and sell the company.

At Loam, we still hold just over 42.8m shares

I sold 2,500,000 shares at 12:08 on the 14th April.

I'm almost certainly that's a sell.
Look at the share price graph. It tanked after that trade.