Because they're not in the correct jurisdiction and the don't have the passport technology tested in law.
Buying GSX in the new year. A good read.
Your entire analysis is wrong. In 2015 significantly different environmental variables existed. If we subject C19 to those environmental variables, you wouldn't have anything like the relatively limited mortality you have now.
your views are dangerous. best wishes, F_b
Compartimos con vosotros el interesante material que nos dejó @EU_ScienceHub #Sevilla durante la pasada jornada informativa que tuvimos en este Centro de @EU_Commission
We share with you the interesting material that he left us
@EU_ScienceHub
#Sevilla during the last informative day that we had in this Center of
@EU_Commission
So, let's say there's a million people need testing.
and the truth is there's more than that, you can't just test the positive ones.
7.5 minutes per positive test result. I know negatives take longer but we're not testing them in this little game.
Let's assume the device can work continously, at 100% efficient (which it clearly can't).
Then the total number of "device minutes" you need is:
7,500,000 Dm to test 1,000,000 positive people.
so if you had:
1 device, it would take you 14.3 years to test a million people.
100 devices, it would take you 51 days to test a million people.
1,000 devices, it would take you 5.1 days to test a million people.
10,000 devices, it would take 12hrs and 15 minutes to test a million people.
100,000 devices it would take 75 minutes to test a million people.
1,000,000 devices it would take 7.5 minutes to test a million people.
Now... where do you think we are with produiction numbers, and how much of the PCR market do you think we'll be taking by January? It's only actually faster if you can accomodate the capacity - otherwise you get what's commonly reffered to as a waiting list.
There are not genuinely lots of alternatives. What technology are your kids tests? Where is your 98% coming from, what you mean by accuracy.
Go find the sensitivity and specificity of your tests , then compare to LAMP, then invest. :)
Yep - and if you find yourself 85% down, you have to find an investment to do 6.7 bags to get back to where you started... It's easier to keep your head screwed on and ignore the rampy muppets of the twatersphere.
It could be good, but its not a given. Keep some back to buy any dip that you don't judge is warranted, and sign up for the RNSs by email. Wake before 8am everyday until this either fizzles out or explodes. Its better to be on the rocket for half of the ride, than on the rocket that crashes.
I went to hospital for an elective procedure. I took a negative LFT with me. They binned it, took a swab, sent it to the hospital PCR lab, waited 4 hours. Then off we went.
Hospitals will have PCR labs, but much like the hearing thing, you don't take the chance in hospitals, and you don't always have 4 hours. Not all sectors run their own labs. Think ambulances, police (Don't want cells full of covid do u), schools accepting visitors - they have a duty of care, planes, trains ferries, oil rigs, power plants, anywhere that has transient staffing and cares about them..... If it sells think big. But don't invest without learning the lessons from the PCR; same story, 85% down.