Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
sorry @ch i was rushing out before,
the assets it has im dodgy if they are assets or not..still on the fence..when you talk about placing its been 3 placings leaked not just one..aswel other things leaked too is one big factor why its so low..they have had lots of good news but still only two blue days since 15th sept.
there is no price worth the entry if management cant be trusted or can i see a clear plan to my exit point at this time..im not like yourself 105 or so we have different routes..
17 is the top end of value for my entry while not saying, my lower is in the region of 10 -15 for real value. but also i need to see a change ineither direction or leadership or both i think that more where im at..
i reached my entry in rbd@ch
here i dont see any value over 17 and this has other problems leaky about placements i think its over stretched im here to see but im becoming more and more of the opinion this one might not meet my requirements to entry but will see
then one has to ask why such a stupid question you asked?
me thinks you didnt know and that is clear to see
but all the decisions raise by a challenge to the s-o-s decision are contained in the planning and had been discussed but where ruled over by and outside force namely the s-o-s.
@mickybee have you even looked at the plans???
the new planning is for a site next to where the current site is..its a nice green grassy field at the min.
my god
and just as you post it moves down..
no probs happy to help @ch
and this case would be very different to the Greenpeace one.
one, its onshore, that was the first attempt at offshore, 2 they where already in production. were as here the turf has not been cut.
as this is ecomonic it is law of the sea actually.. sometimes call admiralty law or maritime law
a minister can be challenged its not a new concept weather they win or not in a vatican court is another thing
correction "without a challenge"
@mickbee its the concept of accepting orders that are not good with a challenge.. pretty simple to understand..
@covi 19 "As I said, it will be what's in the decision notice" yes and a challenge to the perquisite of the s-o-s decision may well be in that notice is what i am saying. we don't know yet so until we do we can all guess.
its what i would do if i was them because it may stop them having to pay the costs ..
Actually the locals arent too bothered about the site , just the rich and nimbys , and the protestors , WHO ARENT LOCAL
sorry the last bit not in English so couldn't read it.. 1000 plus objections from locals they atound the site..dont care how many ppl live in humber btw we talking locals here
what the worry about extending the road anyway not a big thing really is it to this wanna be mid teir company
the government get over turned all the time.
if you blindly follow order's from above you end up like Germany in the early 40s, not saying this will be their approach but just because an overlord claims something dosent mean its right either.. heid has 14.000 odd messages here ive less than 500 dose that mean i have to agree with everything she says because she like queen bee here
hell no.
and by stating that it opens up all the other issues that where by-passed ..
so they have options to make the appeal more interesting
one example might be
"Following the Secretary of State’s determination that this application does not require an Environmental Impact Assessment"
they could put in the notice they believe at this needs to be challenged and felt as local reps this decision was not correct.? that is possible isnt it? along with other things.
an appeal will have to look at everything again...might be mostly rubber stamping it but might not. if new evidence comes to light not heard before. that would impact an already made decision. (by the way im not saying it will happen just saying its possible)
the crux of rathlin appeal will be the notice given i accept that..but they still need to show that vote (decision) was wrong and how it was wrong. or what ever is in the notice.
@ch not seen you in a while ...i would wait to 15.- 17 region ..
its sinking faster than rbd did when you where in there... still in there? or bailed? im guessing bailed
i agree it will be facts...@mickybee
currently the fact is the plans where rejected, if appealed its all open again and new evidence can be injected if it was not heard before. just saying
like rathlin will have to inject and act or statue when they claim the decision was illegal... by providing evidence if that is good enough it will be over turned but like wise so might the roads issue. Depends what's presented . And it might get passed with the condition of having to widen the road..its not uncommon.
just because they came to an opion dose not mean an opinion is right..
i bet i can get 10 people to agree injecting bleach will get you over covid..(not medical advice) but trump is one and im sure i can get another 8 of his crazy *SS supporters to agree. so just just because you can get agreement dose not make it a good thing.
and anything brought forward to appeal can be added to taken away and presented its all back on the table..not just the one thing being those who made the choice.
@mickybee, surely like an appeal at court new evidence which can alter the original decision can be heard.. or why appeal the local decision?
after all they looked at everything and made their choice..by what grounds can they come forward then? if new evidence is not allowed?? can you explain
mickybee@ fair point...
i agree the earth is flat im sure a few numpty's still dont agree with me..
if new evidence is given i guess they will have to look at it. will they not.