Member Info for Feeks

Morbox - let's not forget they have until COB on Thursday so perhaps the other decisions are more nuanced split decisions. To win the other two would truly be the icing on the cake because this news is already momentous enough. Thank you for keeping us all updated and good luck and well done to all loyal shareholders who will now be rewarded handsomely.

This could hit 25p soon. Wetting myself!

Conclusion
For the above reasons, Petitioner does not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that any challenged claim is unpatentable based on any challenge stated in the Petition.

Conclusion
For the above reasons, Petitioner does not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that any challenged claim is unpatentable based on any challenge stated in the Petition.

Conclusion
As discussed above, Petitioner argues that Dubrow anticipates claim 1 of the ’068 patent. Proving anticipation by Dubrow requires showing that Dubrow discloses all limitations of the challenged claim in a single embodiment, arranged as in the challenged claim. Petitioner relies on two separate portions of Dubrow to disclose the recited limitations, and those portions of Dubrow appear to be addressed to more than a single embodiment. Petitioner does not even allege in its briefing, much less show by a preponderance of the evidence, the contrary position. Accordingly, Petitioner has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that Dubrow anticipates claim 1 of the ’068 patent.

Conclusion
Petitioner has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claim 1 of the ’068 patent would have been obvious over the combination of Dubrow and Nelson.

So, what's the overall - 3 published, 3 wins?

Ok, I am in now. Lo and behold, even the 0068 "Emulsion" patent is a success:

Conclusion
Petitioner has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claim 1 of the ’068 patent would have been obvious over the combination of Dubrow and Nelson.

I've not found one....!

Hi Morbox - I've done that but nothing showing on my screen apart from the 7 old cases.... !?

I cannot find this yet... but sounds like GREAT news!!!!

Br contrarian - you and the rest of the BB. No chance! It will be chaos when the result comes in. I've got a sneaky feeling the market will be a bit muted with a split decision underrating the importance of PTAB which would be a buying opportunity.

I think PTAB is a good thing (win or lose) but the ridiculous legal process needs to be streamlined. Why is it ever thought to be right and proper for a jury to decide such complex technical issues anyway?

Much better thanks for asking

Me too !!! Heart stopped

I stand corrected:

"Our litigation against Samsung continues in line with expectations and our confidence has increased further following the oral hearings conducted as part of the IPR process."

BT has definitely also said that they are more confident now than before on the prospects of generating commercial revenues. There was a question raised on this after on of the two presentations of the interim results.

This type of placing is what just about every AIM growth company must do at some stage, and the price is decent for anyone buying in today like I did. A bit of a dampener for longer term holders admittedly but it is primed to do very well from here IMO with relatively quick expansion plans which ought to gain real momentum by the end of 2022

Commmercialisation into Asia is expected Q1 2023 so not all that far off. If it were ant other country you can add in some time slippage but the Chinese really know how to get on with this sort of stuff. Makes BELL an attractive investment for me - a simple business model selling products and expanding into big global markets. And underpins TEK share price almost on its own.

Nikkinb69 it really depends on how much is awarded on a victory, including the multiplier. That's what BT said in answer to a question. The range of possible damages will be anything from low $100m's to several billion $. Samsung may offer to settle if it goes wrong for them at PTAB.

ps. Your comment "I take some comfort from the fact that BT says they are more confident than previously,!"

I could be wrong but I believe BT' comment was related to the current prospects of commercial success which will be my trusty steed if PTB falls on its backside. If you consider that many of these applications are new use cases which cannot be achieved with CMOS sensors the R&D book seems to have greater potential for follow through IMO too

ddubya are you saying that I am showing signs of anguish and panic.... !? Funnily enough, I had not even the slightest thought of failure until a day or two ago. It is strange how the doubts set in, but I have been off work ill with little else to think about as my wife has me quarantined in the basement a la Josef Fritzl. All I can say is that I have researched for countless hours to back up my decision to invest (before and after) - my only silly mistake (win or lose) - is overreaching the amount to invest which no-one in their right mind should ever do.