Member Info for Feeks

A whole bunch of new filings have popped up today. At first glance nothing too earth shattering

Great summary (but still a "must watch")

. My main source of worry is the unknown - IE what defence will they try that I haven't thought of, or some sort of twist on one of the above"

BorarcicLint. -
The S defence to claim and depsitions were filed a long time ago. It has made its case now, and the court process is strict. S doesn't have an opportunity to change it without leave of tbe judge

NigWitty 'with the greatest of respect' (and I mean it sincerely) you do not seem to be following the plot! You keep misconstruing my posts, and I will comment as I see fit.

That was the view I toom when the PTAB result came in, and I am sticking by it through trial.

I thought it was interesting where he made the point about hindsight aiding PTAB petitioners by making onventions seem more obvious

For me the only fly in the ointment is the point steak and ale made the other day which is Samsung's attempt to narrow the Markam defnition of MMC. That was something I tbought was fixed but the judge now needs to make a decision.

This makes stunning viewing and should underline to everyone how vital it was for Nanoco to get through PTAB and get the trial back on track for September. It looks like the politicians and judges have spotted the flaws.

https://usinventor.org/the-patent-trial-and-appeal-board-its-impact-on-small-businesses-and-inventors/

Tried to do it on my phone unsucceasfully. It was a pie chart. All I can find now is an appendix of the methodology

I have found this useful article (focussing on institution rates) which confirms :

"Patent Institution Rates

Institution is a critical threshold for inventors. Once instituted, a patent is stripped of the presumption of validity and the procedures heavily favor invalidation. Previous reports have shown that the PTAB invalidates 84% of patents (in part or whole) that reach a final decision. This analysis covers 5,983 patents for which the PTAB has issued an Institution Decision."

https://usinventor.org/ptab-statistics/

I am out today but will try to retrieve what I was looking at previoualy. Same source I think but was the % for all claims surviving excluding partial success. I might have misinterpreted it too but will check.

Nakhla- same ones. If one pays the registration fee as you probably did like me then the docketbird updates come out quicker.

Good post steak and ale @ 12:19.

Anyone can check the PTAB stats on this too.

Patentees have a 13% success rate. It was only 6% for 2021. Nanoco got through that stage wholly intact so they are in a small minority of claimants going into trial. The articles I posted recently comment on how 'Big Tech' relies heavily on PTAB invalidity challenges to knock inventors down.

Whatever happens with the important MMC argument, Samsung to be arguing at PTAB in support of having used an emulsion in its process - Dubrow - as it said the epoxy was not completely evaporated. There would be no issue about this at all if it was not using an emulsion

The market is shocking and Nanoco is not immune. It is times like this that one that one really gets to know about oneself as an investor... are you prone to greed and fear, and now regretful? Or are you happy to stick with your decision even though it might mean taking further painful paper losses. It is difficult to see much of a rally before a trail result without a).news of settlement or takeover, or b). Commercial conteact news.

There is a good chamce we will see neither and there will be a further drift downwards before September. My only regret is not holding off longer with my over exhuberent top ups, and maybe top slicing a bit, as I'd be rather more pleased with drops like we have seen today.

https://thisisgravity.co.uk/gravity-and-bristol-port-5g-connectivity/29/06/2022/

Belluscura PLC

(“Belluscura” or the “Company”)



Belluscura Launches Direct to Consumer Sales and Distribution Plan



New Direct to Consumer and Partnership Distributor Plan expected to increase revenue and gross profits



LONDON, U.K. AND PLANO, TX, U.S. (30 June 2022). Belluscura plc (AIM: BELL), a leading medical device developer focused on lightweight and portable oxygen enrichment technology, announces that it has commenced selling its X-PLOR oxygen concentrators direct to consumers (“DTC”) from the following website: www.xploroxygen.com.



The Company has also started a new partnership distribution programme directed at increasing the availability of portable oxygen concentrators to small, local durable medical equipment providers who are experiencing considerable delays in the wait for portable concentrators. Both initiatives are expected to significantly expand our distribution network across the US and to increase revenue and profits. A brochure containing information on the X-PLOR oxygen concentrator can be found here http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/7145Q_1-2022-6-29.pdf.



Robert Rauker, CEO of Belluscura plc, said: "Selling our products direct to consumers allow us to generate higher revenue and increased profits over the longer term. In addition, our new Partnership Distribution Plan is directed at smaller distributors, further expanding our distribution network throughout the US.”



Adam Reynolds, Chairman of Belluscura plc, said “Both the launch of direct to consumers sales along with making our product available to the hundreds of smaller, local supplemental oxygen providers, creates significant opportunities for Belluscura.”

Like I said, we seem to be making different points. If you do agree with me it was not obvious to me either when I originally read your post either, or now. You said that "The buyer is definitely happy". I don't agree with your assumption that there is a single buyer for the reported volume . We don't know how the trade was balanced.

I think I've been clear anyhow, and it was not 'ridiculous' to comment as I did.

I think we make different points Hawi. You said "where there is a buyer there must be a seller". I don't quite agree. What I am saying is that one large BUY order could be matched by lots of small individual sellers, or alternatively, one large SELL order could be matched by lots of small individual buyers. This is important to deciding what conclusions can be drawn, if any.

Yes but the point is that we know there is a single large buyer or seller for that amount. The other side of the trade could be made up of a collection of much smaller trades made over a period.

Would be nice if it was Turcan again!

but we shall probably never know.

What about all the pre-paid trips where Carnival has to foot the cost of increased fuel and increased food prices. The profit margin has gone. Surely, that is why the SP is where it is now.

....... which also reminds me of this one:

Doctors say that every piece of bacon you eat knocks 7 minutes off your life. In that case I should have died in 1732 !

Dumping the overpaid PWC. I'm all in favour.