Member Info for Feeks

I tried to have this debate on "infringement" and how it is proven a few months ago (twice) but it drew no responses back then, which is a pity because it seems quite baffling. My understanding, having done a little research, is that it is N's task to demonstrate infringement but once N gets to a certain threshold of having shown that infringement is possible or likely then S has to rebut it, which probably means having to show how it did things instead. This might be a bit rough and ready as this is me trying to understand as best I can the legal burden facing N's patent lawyers, but it means N can effectively reverse the burden one proof once a jury can be reasonably satisfied that S did probably infringe. S has to show its cards eventually if it wants to prove otherwise.

It ian't obvious to me, and it seems there is always wriggle room. I will feel more comforted if S attempt to refine the MCC claim construction fails

Ok well that's an important point in my opinion, and useful to knows so likewise, thanks. I suppose S could argue it was using one of these older established methods but then it doesn't seem that would have resulted in the right tech for its needs.

I agree with everything you say below Steak and ale. However, the method relied upon by S which relates to this ( i think it was Dubrow) suggested the liquid might only partially evaporated - namely it was also an emulsion that was deposited between the vapour barrier layers. S will be raising all these arguments without prejudice anyway so I expect they will now be arguing it isn't an emulsion they use at this stage of the process. But if that's right I am wondering , can N just argue the S method is so close that it was anticipated by Nanoco's IP? If that's not right, then why hasn't S patented anything itself........!?

True Henry - but when someone starts making unjustified personal remarks which are pure nonsense and designed to attack my integrity then I am bound to respond

My observation is that you tend to make a lot of sweeping assumptions about others NigWitty, and it is not at all endearing. It's quite something to always appear that way in your frequent postings.

I do not think it is reasonably possible to extrapolate "every day" from the words "for the day" relating to a single instance of me checking my account unless one is to make the sort of unjustified leap of logic to which you are no doubt prone. A man who appears to profess the self-proclaimed wisdom of Solomon and an interest in human behavioral psychology really should not be so self-unaware. It is befitting of someone who made a series of ill-judged bets on his own civil litigation cases, losing a fortune in the process.

Whatever gives you the idea that I check my share portfolio every day NigWitty? I can tell you that it is another mistaken assumption of yours, and one that is very far wide of the mark. How is this an important matter to you or anyone else, anyway?

Well how nice for you.

No, I was eagerly counting my additional profit (i..e chickens) for the day. And when share prices decline across my portfolio I cannot ever bear to look.

For the umpteenth time in a row, Nano ends just slightly up after being substantially up earlier in the day. It usually starts to drop as soon as I Iog into my Hargreaves account.

You mean .... Zach Mir?

Who buys just 7 shares...? Is this a balancing trade of some sort. How does this work?

Zach Mir? I've got him positioned somewhere between Mystic Meg and that Wold Cup octopus.

You can still view the link even though it says live streaming. I found that I was not able to fast forward or rewind though.

It seems that Microsalt is performing strongly and valued on the books at only £2m. It's the only reason I invested here originally, and I am extremely happy with how it seems to be going.

Thankyou

What interview? Can you post a link please?

This is the best defensive stock in my portfolio. Carnage everywhere else I look. I always thought the long trial date was a big plus from that point of view and I would even prefer it was happening next year! SP seems to be resilient in the 30-40p range until the trial happens, or news on contracts or settlement.

Yes it has affected the market: the SP has shot upwards, down and back up again.

That's most unfortunate

So remind me the value of his trade please. He has put in roughly £2m....? And let's be clear, you are saying that for Turcan this is new money in the game?