RE: A democracy with the rule of law....28 Jul 2020 17:18
Sooz, maybe my use of the word 'pointed' is incorrect. He has been scathing, yes, and his frustrations are clear, particularly in the last letter, but I should perhaps have said he hasn't been 'demanding' enough. I know it's difficult, because there is a fine balance between that and sounding threatening, but he can mention fairness and emphasise that politics must not be involved in the decision, yet that it has been. That the waiting without timescale in a business sense is wholly unacceptable. That the behaviour of the various authorities towards a private investor has been contemptible. Baylan knows of our February meeting to discuss the legal action possibility, yet we've had no further indication of a decision coming in spite of him knowing this. That the Government is leaving the Company little option but to consider legal action again, in order to protect the interests of shareholders.
Kurt should, in my view, be demanding a date for conclusion of this matter. Using all of the stacked evidence (and he can mention our ANI being in place well before the Sami one), but such evidence to highlight how unjustly we have been treated. How our application continues to be mishandled. He can also indicate that the UN information wholly supports the award of a concession.
He can increase the pressure to get this decision delivered. The law is not unclear Sooz, unless it is made so for the benefit of certain parties.
In my humble. x
Of course, you probably feel that I'm wrong, lol, but clearly enough hasn't been done and we continue to wait without any even loose timeline for a decision arriving. What happened to our supposed application being prioritised? Fifteen months ago now. That was nonsense, but it's something else Kurt can use.
Oh blow! Lol. x