RE: Eric10 Dec 2020 21:13
I really like what you say SJ, but there will soon be five times more shares in issue than in the good old days of a decade ago. I know we have developed Kallak further since then, to a recognised mineable resource of top quality, but the other two projects, particularly Kosovo, are currently draining our funds at a more rapid rate than with a single project. We are dealing with a less straightforward situation than when we only had the Swedish project(s). Plus, we are about five years away from bringing Kal into production, and that's once we've received the concession award and then the environmental permit.
I feel the only way we may achieve 50p again is if we are bought out while the ore price is high and because our grades command a premium on top of that. When we come to the time to mine, we just can't say what the ore price will be. Sentiment of the shareholder base and the potential shareholder does play a huge part in the buoyancy or otherwise of an investment, yes, so I guess if we do have momentum in sp because of good or bad news then nothing can be ruled out, either up or down. We have definitely endured an overly long, excruciating orphan period in this mining cycle, at the hands of the Swedish Government, but Kurt has yet to do enough to ensure that we still aren't at their mercy.
As I mentioned, I really like what you say, and it reminds me of how things should have gone for us, yet here we are.
I'm damned if I'm giving up on it all though, just like your good self. On a positive note, we now have the KU finding that the Government has not had any administrative process in place for moving along our case for three years or more, so we surely have that information in our favour should we have to sue the Government for dereliction of duty and obviously the resultant damage inflicted from such ineptitude on our Company's welfare.
In my opinion only.
Onwards!