RE: RE Response to UNESCO13 Aug 2021 23:42
Howl. Aye, on the morning of the 6th, give old Bayls a quickie phone call to say: "Our response was in the post two weeks ago, you should have it by now. Unfortunately we used Hermes, who may or may not be allegedly total crap. Just in keeping with your referral to UNESCO. But Bayls, swings and roundabouts me old son."
Agreed re the attachment of conditions. I wouldn't be surprised if the inner circle dweebs responsible for this eight year delay now grant the concession and then attempt to make our project impossible to operate by adding a billion conditions, none of which should be added, but hey, that doesn't matter. Lol.
At least we still have the fire in our bellies for this fight. Politics and money so far, as you say, no legals yet, but I can almost hear the sound of white spinny wigs being donned and a gavel in hand held by the biggest spinny wig of all.
We love it don't we? Lol.
Atb.