RE: Ref Jefferies13 Dec 2023 09:37
Bantham.
In reply to your post which makes many assumptions/guesses.
=================================================
YOUR POST with my comments:-
"My point is that IR / building shareholder relationships is a fundamental strategic issue for Angle: they need to raise a lot of cash at some stage ( we all have different views on timelines ).".
- Probably true, although their "Cash runway extended into Q2 2025" as per their official RNS on 09 November 2023 which of course you don't mention.
"They failed to raise what they wanted to raise at the last raise ( and this i know for a fact )."
- Please post your proof of this or withdraw the statement.
They have lost 90% for investors in that equity issue.
- True. Well done, you can tell the truth!
They have damaged relationships with all investors.
- with "all" investors. Have you contacted them all? How would you do this? I don't believe there is a list of all the share holders that we can access? It seems unlikely this is true. Again another assumption made be you which is almost certainly untrue.
"Nero has zero credibility with investors: That foolish interview after the FDA revealed a deeply arrogant individual whom no-one would wish to invest alongside."
- Nero has zero credibility with investors. I take it you are you calling the CEO "Nero"? Is that not an insult?
- "deeply arrogant individual whom no-one would wish to invest alongside.". Again are you insulting the CEO of this Company? It that not libellous together with calling him "Nero"???
- If someone called you "Nero" in writing on the internet where anyone can read it would you be offended?
- If someone called you a ""deeply arrogant individual" would you not be offended?
- Do you realise these comments are libellous under uk law?
And against this backdrop they apparently think it’s a good idea to drop the Head of IR and Jeffries.
- Who cares?
Bantham, what can I say?
I rest my case as they say in court. I hope you don't end up in one, quite litrally.
All IMHO.