Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
I suppose one bit of good news is that CB has spoken twice in the last week and the share price has not fallen. We just need an new RNS detailing the exact way forward for Bushranger in terms of new analysis and or Phase 3 drilling
Is it too early to start talking about Q4 ?
I would like to thank Howezap for his contribution and knowledge. Every question I have asked he has answered in a balanced manner. Yes, he is optimistic about this company but that optimism is not exactly widely shared. I have lost my trust in CB. Every recent step he has taken has resulted in a further drop in value, perhaps exacerbated by his interviews. However, I am actually reassured by Howezap's assessments. Maybe they should do a job swop for the month ? Dubai v East Midlands.
This may be a naive question but how will this improve liquidity for the company unless it is holding shares in a treasury which it can release into this new market ? There are not that many shares in public hands according to a poster a couple of months ago.
Howezap, how does that saying go ? 'In vino veritas.' You are correct, we waste time listening to CB's comments on Roast or another media platform. He has no credibility, his wishful thinking and optimistic statements simply do not bear out. All we can trust are the numbers in the RNS and even then, that is a qualified comment as they can be vague and conflicting, especially when you look at the quarterly mining updates.
Well, everything was going well with a nice steady rise, in fact too well. Some weeks ago, Mr W commented that we should be fine so long as we the Bod do not hit another iceberg. Guess what, we did. This is soo like 2022, a nice rise in Jan and then bang ! Where did that come from ? I agree this bank ethic's range from between either not doing something bad or not getting caught for doing something bad.
We now need a clear, factual statement this week to reassure the market over this review.
Indeed but these little snippets cannot mask that we are now in week 11, 3 weeks past their stated target for the larger prototype. We do need an update to maintain credibility.
I agree DillyD. This board is about discussion of the company not trolling each other for having different opinions. Calling out rampers and de-rampers is fine but do it in a justifiable way. Anything else is just play-ground chatter. As for the comments by the Ape, there is a point here. The company did say 6-8 weeks and to build credibility is does need to provide a timely update, even if the latest prototype is just three pieces of sludge.
6-8 weeks is always going to be approximate but there does need to be an update this week for good or for bad otherwise the company will find out the hard way about expectation management and credibility on the AIM.
I am pleased with the recovery and hope for 1.90 by results day at the least. That said, this time last year or so we were 2.17p. That is some 37p ahead of where we are now and we are in a much stronger position. What we need now is a commitment to greater dividends now that savings rates of 4% can be achieved for cash. We also need to avoid an iceberg to use Mr Wolf's description of the conduct of the bank.
"So from our research into the breed, given patience and time..I’m certain he will eventually bring us the happiness we crave and satisfaction in choosing him. But also for not deciding to pick up a mongrel just because he was going cheap."
Just for the avoidance of doubt, are you referring to the doggy or CB here ? Thanks
Andmillsy. Thank you for the historic research. This sums up my problem with the company, the utter lack of professionalism when it comes to communication. Set a date and work to it! By previous analysis, Q3 will be poor, why do we have to determine this due to the timeliness of the release?
Is it too soon to be asking about Q4 results and confirmation of full production at FB ?
I am hoping for at least 4.5 , maybe even 5p next mon
Success will depend on edibility, scalability, nutritional value and cost. I am less concerned about the latter as this can be driven down over time. At the moment we are cracking the science, once this is done, it is a simpler engineering exercise.
This time last year we hit 2.17. That was with the uncertainty of war, inflation, unstable government and high energy prices not to mention more shares in issue. Then all the above hit and Barclays messed up at a strategic level (again). Surely given the above have now been played out with inflation and energy prices falling, the war not heralding the onset of WW 3 and the government showing a degree of competence we should be at least cruising towards these levels again ? Cue another board level strategic 'mistake'.
Higher - 189
The penny has just dropped, beech not is against lab grown meat in it’s entirety. I see his point, if this takes off, farm grown meat will go the way of the steam train. Sad for many but essential I am afraid.
Great progress so far but it would be even better if, when the next fillet is produced, they answered the following questions,
1. Is it edible ?
2. Does it have the same nutritional value is say farm grown beef ?
3. Is it cost comparable in terms of time, money and energy?
I would accept this may be an issue of scale and technology improvements along the way. The time one is interesting as it takes a long time to 'grow' a cow. I suspect the next fillet is being grown at the moment. The days of a Star Trek style food replicator are not yet here.
Great progress so far, it would be great to see some photos of the next slightly larger prototype. This would really stir up interest, unless it looks like a lump of tofu.