We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
That is if it diluted, a stock split is different.
I am pretty sure there has been numerous stock splits over the past few years - and a maximum market cap of about $15bn.
JD's model is unique in that, rationale people would not spend £150 on trainers that look slightly different from a £40 pair... (without them being 'designer' at least). Tighter budgeting is not going to make irrational people stop their spending habits - and I imagine that many people who get these cost of living payments will be using them on clothing as soon as they come in and worrying about their bills at a later date. An alternative argument is also that people who cannot afford to buy £150 trainers would not be spending that money on trainers regardless of the current economic outlook. It is the middle class that will be squeezed on these types of purchases, but as previously stated, young singles pride themselves way too much on appearance to give up these luxuries - and many may still be living at home or receiving support from their mortgage-free parents.
Biosynex will undoubtedly continue to buy
I don't understand what has changed from yesterday, we have known about this dispute for over a year and it was priced in over the year
Well, anyone want to buy my shares off me for £6 each? No? Then why would someone want to buy a share for £3 if someone's willing to sell it for £2...
Who's going to stop him though? The west avoids war religiously now.
The underlying tones there are spot on, this coming from a 25 year old who does not really follow the new hypes. Nothing gets on my tits more than diversity quotas right now either, having missed out on internal promotions to "more experienced" candidates yet them being fresh out of uni with only a bachelor's and my master's being downgraded to nothing because apparently my demographic isn't needed
The fact of the matter is, if you were to be thrown into a camp, or sent to war, Russia, China, whomever it may be, would not care about any desperate attempts for attention.
The demise of the west is being brought to us by nothing more than our inability to remain meaningfully productive.
I mean, the biggest problem today with national security is, the west in terms of military personal, are extremely weak (relative to the the other great powers). They trust institutions to bring peace, just like the nation's did in 1933, the League of Nations was a diplomatic failure when Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia, just as was the UN and NATO in preventing creimeas annexation.
Institutional sanctions and collective security only truly works if nations are fearful of further escalation.
I would be surprised if China was watching how Russia has just walked into Ukraine to no real opposition and thinking, "let's try the same with Taiwan". Nations are not fearful anymore. The anti war rhetoric has gone too far, and he reliance on goods from China and power from Russia will inevitably gift them more and more territory.
A country like Germany, who is extremely reliant on russian gas, needs to make a stand, in WW2, sacrifices at home had to be made, rationing for example, for the greater good of global security and prosperity. However, we have finally found the weakness in the capitalist model and the dangers to security it may bring when a nation is almost self sufficient... The other nations need to keep their economies going and people fed through trade and can't risk retaliation measures.
Surely the only logical defense of the company would be to start a share buy back if there is no gentleman's agreement in place between bio and nova. Cancelling out their vote, increasing share price, and using up cash
See I'm just thinking of the man United takeover now... Taking debt out against the club to buy the club. With the fact we have so much cash in bank, it would be pretty easy get a private equity fund to agree to back this and then take some cash back
Is it reasonable to assume that the RNS on Tuesday for COVID approval was there to try and inflate the price to stop Bio buying on the cheap but didn't gain any traction?
Those suggesting that the Tr1 is part of some kind of possible joint venture, this RNS screams, "ah sh*t, we've been bashing our own price for a year, and now have left ourselves really open"
So essentially, a takeover would not be beneficial to the board and their ltip
The purpose of the question was to figure out whether there is knowledge on the board and that the incentive plan was deliberately announced when it was
If a takeover is agreed, hypothetically speaking (as we know there is no official offer on the table and the RNS yesterday may mean nothing), does the LTIP still get paid out if an offer is made at say £7.50
To be fair HarChris, in a similar boat, my average was £3.74 before the stop below £2, although continued to buy and have got it down to £3. Although, hopefully, your whopping 60% off will appear very quickly.
My question here is, as an unvaxxed person, what is happening to change exactly that? I have no issue if I get COVID again, I will continue to take tears for the safety of others, but I think it's ludicrous to think that a vaccine is the be all and end all
I missed out on £12 from initial £1.20 buy in rip, still holding now like the mug I am, and averaged up to £3 over time haha what a plinker
Anyone else getting the 52 week low up as 1.30p?