Dreamboat you don't have to agree with someone to be interesting disagreement is good to broaden your own perspective I have questioned quady a few times and his answers were always polite and respectfull So he's OK by me
Hi Quady I was just pointing out red said 1.8 when you said you started with 1.8 and now have 1.2 Reds original post said why would £1 be cheap wouldant you be happy with £1.8m I said it would be £1.2m obviously @£1
The sp doesn't feel like T rex is coming to town . You would think if deals are being done there would be at least some little leaks . And volume would be increasing
Monticristo it's like this I hands down voted for nm because I see him as the safest option for looking after my investmet however when I thought that decision was being taken out of my hand I have to admit I was quite excited
Rcgl2 that was exactly the point I made at the time basically 3 enterties voted against nm and the rest are for nm. So why should he go fare enough if the 3 had 51% of the shares but they don't and for good reason
Top tip it sounds boring because you whant to smash it out the park but only invest what you can afford to lose this is near a to gambling than investing you can win you can lose its your money your choices
Quady I would disagree with you there when I financed my house on a 25year mortgage The bank new its unlikely I would still be there in 25 years time but they had the security they need to make the deal happen
Steve basically what you are trying to say is 3 organisations 2 of them interested in getting our shares cheep voted against . and many thousands of others voted in favour