Member Info for Dustyslay

Almost 100% up since your most senior Voice and Highly opinionated member 4kandles called it a day incorrectly. I think most can agree, he over plays his knowledge. Always said this had legs

Name Shares Outstanding

Aterian PLC 11.477 M

Critical Metals PLC 67.39 M

Metals One PLC 142.2 M

Materials 294.6 M

East Star Resources PLC 397.5 M

First Tin PLC 451.9 M

Anglesey Mining 484.8 M

Great Southern Copper PLC 560.9 M

Galileo Resources Plc 1.163 B

Ariana Resources 1.936 B

Corcel PLC 5.559 B

Kodal Minerals 20.247 B

Once this Drys up Castle, Volume. You should exit like i correctly suggested last time

Metals One (MET1:LSE) has a free float of approximately 55%. Free float refers to the number of shares that are available for public trading, excluding those held by company insiders or major shareholders. 

Castle,

I get the sense the existing warrants will have at least 50% of them still to go. They will have been presented arranged, and when the market reaches a price they will be offloaded into the market thats how it works, sell the warrants to raise the capital but at dilution of shareholders in the intermediate. The 2nd wave is inevitable, they only have 132 million shares, Kodal has 20 Billion. EEE has almost 700 million. So plenty of room for them to sell warrants, at a price orchestrated into the market likely at a premium to set price raising available funds etc

The Bash,

Im not invested here, there is plenty of time to look at the company at this period, im looking for quality than the quantity right now and I have 3 very good mining stocks already so not desperate to jump in.

But im looking at the prospects of the sites, Castle? Well he is just here, shouting words from the alphabet, as per

That's it!!!!!

You have a Narrow mind Tim!! I couldn't put my finger on it, why you say such daft comments or ask some bizzare questions. Its a closed mind, with a very narrow view with very little room to grow.

Majes sense now

Profifsniffer,

I completely agree, its the metals. Everyone's heading to Tech/AI and although I have a few stocks its the precious metals behind it that will be fought for, not the battle for Tech but the resources for demand. So ive aligned myself with 3, This one, EEE and CRML(Nasdaq) for varying materials, varying markets over the past couple years now the Tech buzz has settled and its the supply chains thats going to be critical. Metals one, looks of interest to me. Still in the inferred, licensing stage but Uranium and Vanadium in Wyoming license for 2 areas may explain some large (600k cash) and 100k plus buys appearing at staggering prices. I still think ill beat today's price, so ill wait.

But agree there, I think Sam Garret knows this too and has gone looking for the next big thing in Chile on that basis. Can't see him chasing ghosts after GGP. Just need those drill results to start building up here, creating a picture to create that volume it needs

Anyone noticed how Nasty, and personal Buried Treasure has gotten lately? Chain?

And he calls me a peice of work.

Look in the mirror Pal.

Castle mate why do you keep saying Finland!! With a Rocket, you're coming across as you are buzz wording for ramps to cash in. Finland are an Inferred resource, and unlikely to produce this kind of Buzz, think EEE. They have other sites than the Titanium, you just dont hear much of them. Finland will be that, Wyoming will be this ones marque site.

It goes Inferred, indicated, probable, measured, proven.

Inferred being the least amount if confidence level and not what would create volume for a site like Finland

Eachtotheirown,

Its like a Shell Game with Howard, and now he is aligning OO with HUI i just smell a Rat and just for Mug punters who believe you will get something out of it all. Spikes to keep the punters happy but in 10 years your still in HUI and he has moved on. Millions of bags, to your none. Considering the thousands of available stocks, surely one without howard would be better

Nettles,

No i understand, you just asked for a reason why I wouldnt but ive not looked into it at all, I just see it heavily traded, never off rock bottom and continously adding shares so always sitting below value. But your logic is sound in principle, and theoretically should work that way but will it in reality long term. I'd have to look deep, ive been looking at that metals one. The more I dismiss it, at first avoid am now looking at the projects and the intrinsic value of its potential. Which would explain large buys at 600k 200k etc happening at elevated prices so like most, the more you dig into the layers it paints a better picture.

So as Svend did with EEE, im sure if he has the time and less AI assistance he may change his opinions with a little digging.

Good luck with it, im sure you done your DD

Jbatch,

"and I have not read anywhere as to why the previous firm sold this land.

Who told you that? Him? Its BS, it has historical data and surveys, most lands do. Thats why they know where to look, ive not read anywhere about previous land owner. Total Mug he thinks he can take people for. Wyoming has 53 unlicensed patents to historical land, if they find both Uranium and Vanadium well....... those large buys that have been happening for a few weeks now tell a lot. Could easily be US based investors trades

Profit sniffer,

Do stick around, I like what your cooking. Smells Good, im certainly in no position to weigh in on that subject, but if your expertise in the area is as fluent as your very well polished explanation im all ears on your thoughts about this particular investment.

And your reason for buying. We need a few professionals around these boards if im honest. Too many phonies, and 5hit talking Gebronies around

"btw if any single person bought 4 million shares then that would make them one of the top individual shareholders and should be in the published list - who is this person?

This is above the 3% threshold so a TR1 should be issued

You should also be aware that a trade involving a very large number of share can be a privately negotiated trade between parties including institutions off market.

🤣🤣 educating people off Google on Block Trades to sound credible.

Then say this:

"think you will find that nearly all the people on here are GAMBLERS - they cannot be anything else because currently there is no investment case.

I think the Block Trades would disagree with that sentiment.

NTC,

20,241,116,260

Because somewhere along the line, that share count will have to be addressed first. But if your in at 0.09 sod it, why not its got the shares to create some crazy volume. Are you looking for a long, 3 year hold or a target percentage in mind. I really couldn't advise, as I don't know your aim for the stock.

Svend,

You have no idea how refreshing an assessment that was to read, having been EEEs most ardent Adversary to the often ramping nature, and glass house approach to anything that resembles common sense you literally put in a Nutshell, what many fail to hear or desire to listen.

"Titanium market is niche — price swings & low transparency"

"Strong titanium demand (paint, alloys, green tech) 💰 Financing risk — tough markets can choke funding"

"Potential JV or takeover if scale confirmed ⛏️ Drilling might disappoint — resource may underdeliver"

Just some of the thoughts that reflect my own balanced view on things, that ive said quite recently. Deramping no doubt zzz

But as always.

Risk vs Reward. I've had it 2 years, I have a solid position and massive risk reduction, low avg, high shate count built on those market swings you mentioned.

located next to bill gates terrapower facilty

https://www.**********.co.uk/articles/metals-one-begins-exploration-in-earnest-at-squaw-creek-uranium-project-27135b4/

warrants aside, this is project to watch if the initial phases find rich levels of detection and it broadens further than the boundaries.

LTI,

"I suggest you read the relevant MET1 RNS - you are seriously embarrassing yourself . Better for you to keep quiet"

I shall do that, as no im not looking at the warrants or the RNS tabs of them currently, thats your focus not mine. Im not invested, so one step at a time fella. Im looking at the projects, the locations and hopefully the early data. When I have time, ill go though the warrants, financials and fundamentals and find a price suitable to reflect their progress position on what you call a Lassonde Curve. Its very early days, licences, cash building, surveys etc. Ill buy at its real depth, which I dont know yet, I prefer to trade on Nasdaq not UK stocks. So ill take my time, im hoping you have fooked off by then really

LTI,

"Yet again - as well as having been successful in their field they also like a gamble"

So your mates came gambling and got burnt? I hope you call them stupid, their the ones who bought it, sought out advice, didn't take it, didn't sell and now at a loss 🙄 they don't sound Rich, they sound thick as fook!!! And so do you, as your story isn't holding up under scrutiny really. Im not saying the warrants are not an issue, but ive seem bigger share counts, for more solid mining so although dilution often occurs its not too top heavy at current. I dont think this is as clear cut as you're suggesting in terms of a long term investment. I'd like to see where it is come end of year before I decide on anything, I think the Wyoming (Vanadium) if transcends into a significant discovery on US soil it will likely find assistance. Certainly if its a level of purity thats rare, its dominated by 3 countries. China, Russia and South Africa so its a project that needs researching here, for proper investors not gamblers as your mates