Member Info for Dorfan

ASI made a statement that “ Green tariffs are usually the cheapest” so I want ASI to tell us the supplier and the tariff rate per kWh.

ASI

Show us some pricing for green energy per kWh. The best I found was one for 25.12p. I found better prices for standard deals non green or anything else.

MV

“…. should have their cvs scrutinised for they are all as thick as reeves, so they must have got their cvs mail order from some place”

Didn’t know a single cell amoeba had the ability to know what a CV is.

Starmer is believed to be sitting on £400,000 worth of land in Surrey. I bet he is waiting until his kids are old enough to be given it with a house on as a freebie. I bet he has already secured another special deal for himself where he will be exempt to any laws governing the giving of wealth to his children.

I suspect he has also wangled another deal where he won’t be paying inheritance tax as well. One rule for the workers and pensioners and another for Starmer and possibly his mates.

AS - so is Reform any different to the current crop of corrupt Labour and Tory run councils over the last 50 years, no.

Shall we spend hours digging up dirt on them as well?

Let’s just accept that as it stands now Reform stand a good chance of ousting Labour, doesn’t matter how you try to trash them it will likely happen.

AS

“ The Battle of Britain, a celebrated victory, was largely won by Polish fighter pilots”

Even I have to say that is a load of ‘b0 ll0cks’ AS. They did play a big part but not a pivotal one over our pilots. They had experience against the German air crews and until they had to make a run to the UK when Poland collapsed.

Polish pilots made up 5% of the RAF's Fighter Command in the battle.

They were credited with around 12% of total enemy aircraft shot down,

AS

“ Political momentum must be matched by competence, coherence, and the ability to deliver”

Well Labour have proved already that they can’t deliver on any of the above, better have a general election now and let someone else have a go, certainly can’t do any worse can they? Pledges that never materialise or U turned, lies, lies and more lies. Same old Labour from the 70’s, for those that can remember those days.

Shall we talk about all the old guard councils run by Labour and Tories for the last god knows how long about failings and the huge amounts of debt and corruption that goes on that we are not invited to share?

1963

“The Government has refused to disclose how many migrants are being detained for removal to France.”

Well it sounds like a big round number - ZERO

They have no intention of sending any back, smoke and mirrors again. Starmer thinks a bit of waffle will appease the people of the UK, he really is as thick as sh 1t

AS

“ At least it will be used for something useful instead of people singing hymns and praying to their imaginary friend.”

I would like you to stand amongst 100 Muslims and then say that about Mohammed. People are happy to slag off Christians yet bend over backwards to support every other faith in the world.

Farage can’t be any worse than two faced Starmer, at least Starmer has a proven track record over the last twelve months of bringing the country to its knees.

He has backtracked multiple times on his pledges, acted like Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini all rolled into one

NIESR says a toxic mix of weaker economic growth, lower tax receipts, higher borrowing, and Labour’s failure to deliver the welfare savings it planned means the chancellor is now on track to break one of her own key fiscal rules.

That rule - the so-called “stability rule” - is Labour’s pledge to get the current budget into surplus by 2028/29. That means bringing in more through taxes and other income than it spends on public services and welfare

Back in March, the government’s official forecaster – the Office for Budget Responsibility – thought the chancellor would just hit that target, with £9.9 billion of headroom to spare, a very small margin. NIESR now thinks Rachel Reeves will miss it by £41.2 billion.

That’s not just a miss - it’s a very big hole.

NIESR’s assessment is particularly stark: it believes the chancellor may now need to find more than £50 billion just to restore the wiggle room she had five months ago.

Labour’s 2024 manifesto promised no tax rises for “working people” and no increases to National Insurance, or the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax or VAT.

That pledge is no longer sustainable.

Millard says the Chancellor now faces an “impossible trilemma”: rewrite the borrowing rules; cut public spending; or raise taxes.

Investors see the UK as a riskier bet and charge higher rates of interest than before, and departmental budgets have only just been set, making tax rises the only realistic option left.

“It is inevitable that Labour will have to raise one of the big taxes [income tax, national insurance, VAT] - and that will affect working people, in that sense, unfortunately, they will have to go back on the manifesto pledge.”

It estimates the chancellor could raise £8 billion a year by freezing the thresholds of income tax and national insurance beyond April 2028.

NIESR points out that raising £50 billion a year would require a 5 percentage point increase in both the basic and higher rates of income tax.

AS

“ Somewhere like Jersey for instance.”

Why would you want to make the people of Jersey suffer, such a stupid suggestion. Better off sending them to one of many currently uninhabited Scottish islands with a one man tent and a fishing rod. Weekly drops of essential additional food to augment the fish they catch. That will make the £7 they get go further. Instead I see them in my local Sainsbury’s walking the alcohol aisles p11 sing it away instead.

A couple of non squeaky clean antics by Labour

The Labour Party has suspended 11 councillors who had joined a WhatsApp chat at the centre of a scandal over offensive messages.

EXPOSED: South Tyneside Labour’s culture of entitlement, cover-ups, and public money abuse. Between June 2024 and May 2025, almost every conference attended by Labour councillors involved first class travel, paid for by you, the taxpayer. This happened despite multiple lawyers advising against it as it broke the rules. That advice was written, formal, and clear. Labour ignored it.

We could also talk about Labour MP’s as well, to start, a certain person lying on her CV to get a job.

Sent from my iPad

AS

“Geopolitical instability: Conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East are still affecting energy markets and investor sentiment.”

An energy market here where they generate 30 mins of electricity by gas and then charge the rest of the day at the same rate for wind and solar which allegedly is much cheaper. We are being ripped off as per usual.

AS

“What is the British army and navy job description?”

We need to introduce martial law to control these migrants that are committing crimes. Give them freedom to use whatever force necessary to.

AS - Who supports anyone committing a crime and has no issues about it. Since when has crime been acceptable in this country as an everyday occurrence that those that are law abiding have to accept.

If you commit a crime you should be called out for it and dealt with. For those that are migrants of any sort should be automatically deported back even for just a minor incident.

AS

“ 425 offences between 211 people isn't many if you compare against other groups within society.”

But there shouldn’t be any offences in the first place. But it sounds like you are happy that offences happen and we have to accept it, well I don’t.

STP - so on you meeting with Reeves she told you they are going to double or treble then? A three bed semi I believe may run out at say 4-500K in the south? With a council tax of around say £2,400 and you really believe that they will be paying three times that? The working man that Labour won’t be taxing (ha ha) can’t afford that increase. Just watch repossessions start climbing.

STP - you really are a donkey. If you had done some research you will know that if they go down the route of charging for value of your property it will be based on somewhere about 0.48% of the value. It certainly won’t be double or treble.

Properties in the North will gain from it but funds won’t be shifted from the south to the north, so more misery for underfunded northerners. You can now see that properties in the North will slowly go up in value so councils get more income and the poor Northern worker will need to find more money to buy a house. A real win win but not for the worker.