RE: Some posters do read rnses26 May 2017 21:13
Your not on filter at the moment QE.
Just to answer your questions first of all, before I challenge you to post up proof of your childish allegations.
Pre Brexit was saying more than £3, cannot recall the exact value (£4, £4.5?), but that was when the sp was around £4 and they hadn't issued further profit warnings and obviously BREXIT hadn't happened!....durrrr.
Yep saying it will now be £3 (was my posting not clear enough?). On another forum I'm saying the same £3. Think you are stalking me and need to read my posts more carefully. I have openly stated that IMO these are worth £2.70 (£3 at a push, but would not even think of buying for various reasons).
Now please post up some proof of your wild accusations- have always posted honestly, yes I lost money here (not a packet) and yes it was completely down to me and nobody else, but I am in no way bitter, am an investor and expect to pick losers, par for the course. There used to be a poster on here (forget his name) that always posted up negatively and that the main issues here were due to lack of governance, to my shame and ignorance I completely rebuffed his views and think I filtered him in the end............hands up, how wrong was I.
Your main issue with not only me but other posters on this site is you believe that nobody has the right to post anything unless your holding............news flash, people can and do, those with issues should ask themselves why and am I exhibiting confirmation bias. I'm posting my honest views, not deramping, not trying to wind people up.......just trying to learn from my experience, see how this fascinating story unfolds, but also to put forward a contrarian view, nobody has to listen, but maybe some will and they may end up not losing a "packet" - but as ever DYOR.
Now, you stated that MA has been buying shares, and that you do read rnses, so can you post up some evidence to support that. Also you were citing the laws/regs around takeovers, would you mind posting up some proof of what you posted (I cannot see anything to support your claims, in fact quite the contrary).
As regards "encouraging staff to hold onto shares for a lengthy spell and offering them a bonus for doing so" - it's only for those that actually meet the targets and get the "bonus" and do you know how many employees actually qualify?, well let's just say that if every single employee on the scheme hits their targets then it will only cost £13m, not exactly going to break the bank is it.
Regards
DD