RE: CFD's / OMJ4 Oct 2023 14:31
Tony, in your post you have missed an important point with CFD's. CFD's can allow a short position, as you said, you can bet on the share price movement, but in either way. What I often see, when stake building or selling, the CFD is sometimes in the opposite direction of the actual share trade. This hedges the adverse movement by such large volume in the market. I do not follow PANR, so not sure (or interested) on what ever happened there, but this is sometimes an explanation for these type of fluctuations. EG, the participant could have dumped some shares and hedged this with a short CFD. The profit form the short CFD would have made up some of the drop from the sale. I see this all the time in other stocks, especially from Blackrock. For a smaller operator, (still bigger than a PI) then yes, they may sell shares and move to CFD, especially if being margin called elsewhere. Selling shares and going to CFD would in theory free up more cash. But from a single TR1 you cant work out which one of these scenarios it is. For me, I would prefer a large investor to hold direct shares, it shows more commitment. Also the CFD could actually relate to direct sales in the market, by the counter party so closing a large CFD could cause volatility.
In the case of Polus, my feeling is that they are more interested in voting rights (again offered by CFD's) rather than exposure to share price movements. I base this assumption on the behaviour of them and JPM, especially around the AGM and the special resolutions that were voted down and not approved - i.e. if there is dilution then those with voting rights will get first offer.