RE: Results29 Jun 2024 08:46
never thought they would resort to robbing investors. splitting the shares in to 2 classes and having the only part with any value as a non traded entity (parmenion ). the main draw to the investment case here was the valuable stake in parmenion and hoping that it could be realised, if nothing else to keep the company afloat, or better still improve shareholder value. by moving the stake to a non traded entity, they must have known that they were depriving the average investor using a sipp or isa of being able to invest. there by robbing the 70p stake in parmenion for a measly 30p. i thought these guys here had integrity, but no just another aim ****co that robs punters.
i can not see any reason why this needed to happen, and as far as i can see no reason was given, other than 'tidying up'. if they felt it was that untidy, why not just force a sale. they must realise this equity is a failure, and have just concocted a scheme to get their personal money back. you watch the placing coming down the road after they have finished pillaging.
regards the matched bargaining facility, it will be a tool to force small investors out at even lower prices. these guys can probably wait 5 years for an exit, and it just shows that if they wont sell it now then they are not in a hurry to sell it at all.
i sold out yesterday, i do not want to invest in a tiny asset manager that will probably need a cash raise at some point, while behind our backs they divi out the assets. this incident and a number of other recent issues down at the dog **** end of the market made me sell out of 4 other microcaps. yes they are undervalued, but it seems smart money will make sure the average investor loses his shirt (richard griffiths et al). many stocks now, you are left worrying that they will de list, or pull some other stunt like this one. i thought cambel fleming was a decent guy, but i feel differently now.