RE: 2.49p24 Apr 2025 17:53
58% irrevocable undertaking so its already got more than enough votes. I would file this one in the un expectable category. Much like Wandisco where one rogue was falsifying orders, it could just be one rogue trader.
On reflection, perhaps the root cause was already making itself shown in the last results - a lack of cash generation. Had they made a bit more money last year it might be a different story. I was never a fan of the alternative banking idea. They should of stuck to trading forex. The company buying them a private forex broker with cash to spare proves my point. They have done very well out of this, but that is the market.
I would estimate I am about break even here. I had vast holdings dating back to the previous collapse in May 24, which I added to around Christmas. My holding was so large (for my own pot) that I had to start to sell it. My average was 33p. I had profit from the sales, which about nets out from the remaining loss. I'm so used to these disasters it has barely registered. I do feel fortunate to have reduced so much, being that it was only one of a few in profit, I was raiding it towards to the end, which has saved me. I will say again though, financial markets made unprecedented moves, American presidents did unprecedented things, and plenty of firms have blown up recently. I dont know if I would do anything different next time.