RE: Edison new report24 Jul 2025 19:26
Https://cdn.janushenderson.com/webdocs/HFEL+Half+Year+Update+2025.pdf
If you read the last report for the previous half year, you will see that earnings were £9.5M, but they paid out over £20M in dividends. Each quarter dividend costs around £10.6M (based on the then share count). You can also see that gross revenue was £12.2M (giving the £9.5M after expenses). Of the £12.2M only 7.4M came from investing activities, another 4.7M came from 'other'. If you delve deeper, in to the accounts
https://cdn.janushenderson.com/webdocs/Half+Year+Report+2025.pdf
you can see that they raised £9.7M from issuing shares:
"The Company has issued 5.2m shares in six months to 28 February 2025. This issuance has raised £9.7m.."
So even with the extra income from issuing shares it doesn't cover the dividend. Someone posted below that it was ok, because they have a dividend reserve - that's ok to a point, but really you are just being handed back your equity, rather than making money. In August 24 they had £29M of distributable reserves, but then in Feb 25 they only have £18M. I suspect this accounts somewhat for the reduction in Nav from August 24 of 224p to February 25 216p.
I raised this point, as the EGM rns was the final straw for me, I already understood that the situation was unsustainable, and now they are proposing to issue a further 10% of the share count, so that dividend bill per quarter will be more like £12M. Am I only one who thinks that this is unsustainable?
Obviously a lot will depend on the underlying portfolio performance, but the returns need to increase by over 100% for the dividend to be covered. There is an element of smoke and mirrors with the triangular arrangement of equity, distributable reserves, and income from shares issued. i.e. you can say that the income goes toward investing in equities, and that distributable reserves are paying the dividend, but its still coming out of the same NAV at the end of the day. I really think they will cut the dividend, unless Asian equities multi bag (in which case you would make more money else where).
Still great to see so many happy to should down a post using factual inaccuracies like "the dividend is covered". It plainly isnt, just scan down page 9 for the £9M income figure and page 10 for the £20M outgoing figure. Its Rachel Reeves basic accounting, selling gilts to pay the interest on gilts. Same reason the yield is high.