RE: Bunker Hill23 Nov 2018 15:33
I didn’t say it was a good deal. I dont know enough details to decide either way - and don’t know that anybody else does beyond assumptions and speculation. I was just saying how it played out. I asked the question when they first had the notice of default, because they were late, and was told they are trying to renegotiate terms and you don’t get the best deal if you pay your bills on time. Guess that’s the same as buying a new car, walk away and the salesman calls you back with a better price. Seems their strategy worked.
FYI. I don’t hold here anymore, just dropping in. I have no trust in management and frankly feel conned by the numbers they widely proclaimed and they never got close to delivering. I can accept the force major events, but not the manipulation of how they presented free cash, net debt - where they conviently forgot the large amount of invoices still to clear - and the hugely over optimistic 132k @ 695 AISC. Plus Dan has turned in to a petulant child after a very slick 2017. He felt like “one of the lads” in 2017, thinks he’s fkn Ceaser now! He’s a coward. Good leaders stand up - he’s hiding.
Saying all that. Good luck to those still holding. I’m sure there is still value here, and one day HUM might find a way to realise it.