Member Info for Dar-

Recovery !!!! What is this strange word.....? Grumpy if you spend the day travelling and the share price falls by 13%. What would happen if you were on holiday for 1 week. Investing was never meant to be easy..... Sometimes the downs outweigh with the gains. That will upset some people

Yep _ it is dire 13% drop in one day. Some really silly posts. sorry I can't give any crumbs of comfort. The BoD do need to reassure any pi's left. AEM is going to be very rich if the price falls to 10p (won't go that low).

I have read your posting (rants) and have a great big smile.... Some are worse than others but in the main terrible. My few shares will not make a difference either way. Best wishes

Apparently, if I read correctly there are many actions against Slater and Gordon. From the observations made elsewhere the BoD of SGH will be heading for the exit. Three years ago SGH were a large multinational company, but today only a "shell" remains.

This headline is somewhat interesting --- Slater and Gordon shares jump 13.5% on $28m class action settlement, but also misleading does anybody know how shares in Slater and Gordon have fared in 2017. Thanks Grumps for the observation made by Maurice Blackburn puts even more pressure on Slater and Gordon and their reliance on due diligence. I do think the SGH will try to reach a settlement with WTG before court action. Possible in SGH "best interests" however WTG would probably feel more comfortable with a court appearance.

True grumpy, we wait and watch. Nothing can be done until SGH and then SFO concluded. Time

Yes, AEM I do agree with you. But what do you suggest. Sea of red caused by heavy selling and falling sp. A very positive trading update is required ASAP. 1/2 year was 30th June. The bod have limited options

Hi email, I mentioned the charging of the directors to emphasize the length of time the SFO investigation may take before action and not relevant to the share price

I agree with grumps, there no connection between SFO and SGH. The action by SGH will be finished (or closed), long before SFO have completed all the relevant investigation. Whatever, the outcome of SGH has no bearing on SFO. SFO is completely separate from a company listed in Australia. Whilst the SGH action "might be" concluded by 2019. Action by the SFO could take many years (up to 6). An example is Barclays... 4 (ex) directors were charged with fraud this week ...... After how many years. And that was high profile..... IMO view the SFO might eventually say "not in the public interest" to procecute and close the case or commence action against Rob Terry and others for fraud. Oh please can I be on the jury and I am sure that the other 11 members of the jury could come this BB. We would give a fair and impartial verdict on Rob Terry....?

Not really sure if sgh have financial clout or will for a long court case in London. Their team of barristers will want serious money up front before even getting on a plane. I think it's a case of who blinks first.............

Latin phase "Caveat emptor" recalled from my dim and distance past.........

I am not sure it will go to court.............. I can't remember the latin phase for "let the buyer beware". As a man of words GS - quite possibly you know that phase................ But it will be used........

What happened at QPP was not normal behaviour and never will be. There are areas the AIM must improve.But in the main there are some decent companies trading and trying to return capital to their investors. However, if someone decides that they don't want to move on and become a "bitter and twisted individual", who was robbed of their investment (amount not relevant) and they decides no further investment because they are a "bitter and twisted individual. Then Rob Terry and his "misdemeanours" has won. Most people will still stay invested and refuse to allow Rob Terry to sway their view of investing. London's days as a leading, reliable market will remain strong, however the Aim has got serious flaws, which need to be addressed. Quindell was "allowed" to manipulate the markets for far too long and I feel sure that the "powers that be" have had the controls to stop this behaviour. Regrettably they 'chose' not to use them. Best wishes to all (even the bitter and twisted)

I never though you were hiding - I accept your loss were genuine (and quite possibly the tears and sleepless nights). The loss of £49k must be very galling, however if RT was behind bars I feel sure you would visit and provide some words of confort. An investors will not be deterred by any posting on this bb. People will do the research before investment. I do wish the current BoD all the best in trying the make WTG onto resolve the problems caused by events outside their control. Easy to say but forget this saga and move on,............. Regards

I am not really bothered who total is but I can understand his comment. IF i had lost £49k............... I would post a similar comments. Potential investors will make their decisions and not be swayed by a posting by one person. ATB

Steady AEM That might be your last 1k..... I do hope that Watchstone doesn't fall to 10p. That would mean SGH has been successful, the SFO has taken action for fraud. Finally YLF has a bite of the action. I don't think all the above will happen. Regards DAR

after checking a few sites the mcap is £66 mill. Never really believed £2.5bn, someone told a few fibs............... Just a quick ? but why didn't you check the mcap before you brought 10,000. What criteria did you use. Regards DAR

And you never will.... Perhaps 4 years (maybe). Sorry

Hello GS, Many thanks for your observations on SGH and the claim. And there is no rush for WTG. The ball is firmly in the court of SGH. PI's of WTG will have to be patient and just wait for any and all events to happen. ATB

Morn GS, Could this be a signal that SGH are finally waking up to the fact that the claim is unlikely to succeed and SGH would be prepared to discuss without an expensive court case. Reading the postings a few month ago I am wondering if SGH have the financial appetite for the claim. Was Andrew Grech the main driver of the claim against WTG.