Re: also posted on GMA2 Mar 2009 09:13
I have done some of the research you suggest but not quite all - you will find it amazingly difficult to assess the cash costs for each company as they tend to bury them when they are not that great! Also remember currency fluctuations influences this greatly. Believe it or not, it is even pretty difficult to find out resources/reserves for a lot of companies - something you would have thought was fundamental.
The analysis I have done has details on resources, cash, shares in issue, actual or prospective production and share price for 63 different companies which enables me to rate them on market capitalisation and enterprise value per resource and production ounce. (I haven't updated this for a little while for the majority of the companies as I focused on a select few).
On pretty much any measure Norseman comes out by far the highest of any actual producer and stands good comparison with the explorers! When it was 2p or thereabouts the comparison was laughable, with Norseman the best value of all producers and explorers (apart from Mercator which had just gone into administration).
This is indicative of the fact that the market was pricing Norseman to fail. The management and, more importantly, the price of gold have saved it and it now looks very strong going forward. It should be at least 5 times this price on fundamentals.