Member Info for Culpepper

It won’t be unfound or diluted. The MRE should quash any rumours to that effect.

And the more shares changing hands and starting again at a new higher price, the better for us.

Business is what the MMs want. If the volume of trades is there, they make their cash. Price of the share doesn’t matter to them, as long as there’s traders.

Nothing been sold to pieces yet. 82% up over the month.

It is a manufactured argument.

Unless I have missed it and it can be pointed out, nobody has suggested options/warrants will or should be exercised just because they are in the money.

In any event, I very much doubt that Ggp would respond meaningfully to, or initiate a corporate move, without first consulting with Wyloo. When votes are required, it has been my experience that companies, in recommending something, indicate the intentions of any major shareholder with regard to a vote.

Lebugue.

It is not for you to determine what gets posted.

It is a fact, according to RNS, that one of the motivators for ASX listing is to afford access to deeper capital pools.

Nor do I nor did I say so.

But better for them to be in the money, as they are as an average, than not.

Should they want the voting power they have the means to do so, at their discretion.

Was he the smarmy one, chandeliers and that, used to play the piano?

I agree.

Mr. Day might decide it best to hold the ASX listing until any future capital raise is appropriate, underpinning debt facility through equity as may be required by lenders.

It would be at least a valid consideration.

There’s always talk of ‘murmers’ in the market, takeovers, bbs love it.

What’s wrong with a few out there seeing some ‘proper, relevant, and positive RNS’ being published?

Worst you can say is MRE will do no harm, may do a great deal of good, and according to Mr. Day ‘should’ be next up.

If things continue as now, Wyloo will be in a position, perhaps after the MRE but at any future time should they wish, without financial loss, to exercise their warrants ( average in the money at 9p anyway ) and achieve their 14% voting power as a means of supporting or otherwise any corporate moves which might occur.

I still think, my opinion, it’s too early for a divest decision. The MRE will better inform a decision

as will obviously the ongoing FS.

On what we know, I suspect it’s interest in the MRE, as per Charles Archer.

Greatland Gold is on the verge of updating investors regarding the results of more than 80,000 metres of drilling that’s been ongoing since March 2022. For context, flagship Havieron’s current Mineral Resource Estimate stands at 6.5Moz @ 2.2g/t AuEq, but this was already more than 50% of the original maiden resource estimate from December 2020.

This updated MRE estimate has been delayed for some time, but significant financial confidence in Greatland can be found in both its banking syndicate and backer Wyloo, which suggests the upgrade will be significant — and perhaps might even start with a 9.

Analysts — and likely even Newmont itself — remain conflicted over whether the new titanic hybrid will want to retain Telfer and Havieron. Positive comments made by management about the jurisdiction last week point one way, but the fact remains that the value proposition at the current MRE simply does not meet Newmont’s objective criteria.

Of course, there’s always a little fudging room. And a huge MRE update will drastically change the economics.

It’s perhaps an early test of Newmont cooperation, knowing their junior partner wants to get one out for its own shareholders, promised this quarter, and would like it agreed by the 70% holder.

If we’re talking about this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUkthkmSbNM

he’s just saying ‘should be December quarter’ right at the end. Perhaps I missed something somewhere.

That was all borrocks from all sides, wasn’t it? None of the ‘names’ did themselves a service.

Most realise it, but some think there is something ‘wrong’ when they see the computer totalling buys as against sells on the price page. And making something of it. Difficult to see the point in different platforms publishing it. At best, it’s misleading.

There are exceptions. But for the likes of most of us pi’s trading a single trade is just that. A buy or a sell. And the colour immaterial to the transaction, which is either above (blue) or below (red) the mid price. It gets raised a lot, to no effect.

Wish I could see what you can see. All I see is normal trading. Price a little up, indicating more buying than selling.