Member Info for Culpepper

1. You haven’t. Another poster agrees I was correct.

2. None. I’m waiting on a fundraise. However it’s done.

I think the potential for that is accepted.

Nothing ‘bad’ in my posts. Read today, the last few, all of them - then MH picked handbags, and then you blinkered lot join in.

My choice to post, reasonably as I do. Your choice to green bin, or get picky.

SAB. He winds himself up. Got it wrong, according to you and me, and thinks the Ggp RNS about ASX listing is somehow negative. He hasn’t explained why.

But you know, happy to be in the bin instead of him.

All the best.

You misunderstand. I don’t care what you think about me, or do. Though I read all posts.

Enough. Read the RNS. The wording, , the way it is framed. And if you disagree, tell everyone.

I really don’t care.

I am interested though, what is negative? Vote or not? You seem upset about something.

My reading is that the ‘reorganisation’, new company requires a vote. A listing without does not. I have made it plain there were earlier conversations about that. Disagreement.

So I put up the RNS in response to your post.

Interpret it how you wish.

If it’s negative, in response to an earlier post on ASX listing, blame Greatland. You may clarify, for others, what misinformation I have spread, but I doubt they care about this exchange.

Done on that subject.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/GGP/director-appointment-and-asx-listing-update-4efnihfeddfkir1.html

There you go again. Just say what it is. I shan’t respond.

If they are to list on ASX with a new ‘holding’company, you will recall the RNS requires a vote for that part. On my reading, although others have interpreted it differently, a listing without that company requires no vote.

I don’t see it as a conflict, having regard to existing known practicalities on processing. If parties don’t reasonably accommodate each other, nothing will happen. So they will find that common ground.

Observation on timing, is all.

There are events apart from negotiations. I imagine most will want the project resuming, the decline. Paused pending hydrological work. The results of which were to be included in the Feasability Study, which is anticipated to give rise to a shortly following DTM. And according to at least one report, the timing of the ASX listing is dependent upon the timing of the Feasability Study. Makes sense, to date info for new listing in its own domain. And that may fit into a fund-raise, to include own domain ASX investors I understand from reports on here are on the sidelines?

It would look a bit odd for Newmont to be called upon to make a DTM when they say they don’t want to mine it - could be done, but I guess ideally both parties would wish to avoid that.

So decisions/releases seem to be getting more compressed as time passes.

For context, as I am yet again met with unsupported flim-flam, here’s Culpepper’s last, in response to MHO1.

‘But you are making it up. 

For those that are sufficiently well advised to quote 20p, 30p and up, well, I wouldn’t argue with that in time, when money comes in plus an acquisition becoming accretive then. Good luck, and I may become part of that. But it’s not nailed on, as touted/inferred on here. 

Just at the moment, there are processes to go through. It seems the case that many on here believe that if a RNS drops and Ggp finishes up as the 100% owner of Hav and Telfer the price will rocket. Depends how they go about it. It may not be as drastic as some hope for. May not be all or nothing. We don’t know. 

Punters out there seem unconvinced, and I share that doubt. And however you look at it, Ggp is not liquidity poor, but becoming cash poor until commercial mining occurs. 

So I choose to get what I view as the probable raise done. Price action to me says I am far from alone. Rick Rule can do as he likes.’

It is a valid view, but one which this board has decided should not be heard. Scarcely a post that should create frenzied responses.

I'm not about tomorrow, so you can talk about Ggp without mentioning any possible reason why the price ain't doing what you think it should.

Rick Rule mention or no Rick Rule mention.

Sleep tight.

But you are making it up.

For those that are sufficiently well advised to quote 20p, 30p and up, well, I wouldn’t argue with that in time, when money comes in plus an acquisition becoming accretive then. Good luck, and I may become part of that. But it’s not nailed on, as touted/inferred on here.

Just at the moment, there are processes to go through. It seems the case that many on here believe that if a RNS drops and Ggp finishes up as the 100% owner of Hav and Telfer the price will rocket. Depends how they go about it. It may not be as drastic as some hope for. May not be all or nothing. We don’t know.

Punters out there seem unconvinced, and I share that doubt. And however you look at it, Ggp is not liquidity poor, but becoming cash poor until commercial mining occurs.

So I choose to get what I view as the probable raise done. Price action to me says I am far from alone. Rick Rule can do as he likes.

Matthew Riley/Alvotec/Daisy Group seem the obvious, though I wonder now and then what happened with Mxc’s trumpeted deal with Liberty Global.

Wish Mxc would get on and flog this off, as promised. They own almost all of it, and Smith bought more on his own account, so I guess there’s hope of jam tomorrow.

Video

https://streymi.landsbankinn.is/

Who’s a cheeky boy then!