Member Info for CrystalBallBroke

well that was a slightly unexpected tick in the wrong direction for my buying aspirations lol

you lot still think he's going to step down...... awww bless !!

snap, looking to avg down, so every little tic down is important for me

"Looks like some thought you'd be able to buy cheaper, and are sat on the sidelines."

that'll be me..... lol!

something has got to be in the offing, 70% climb on nothing??... something must be leaking somewhere

@EyeGuy .... i do hope your right and that 80p is not unrealistic, but having been under for so long, and by so far, not sure i'd end up holding until then once past my avg

yeah big daily gains here are going to be hard, and potentially harder to sustain, because it crashed so heavily in the past, there are a lot of holders i imagine that only need a fraction of our averages for it to be a multi-bagger for them, so they are going to bail with profit, and that as has been seen elsewhere can stifle the sort of gains expected

LOL... yeah, i'ts well and truely broken, i've made some monumentally stupid purchases and decisions, mainly related to either not pulling the trigger when i should to avg down, to not selling when i'm ahead of the game and then ending up underwater, i know that snorkel feeling!

Whilst i wont say exactly what i've got invested (it's not a life changing/threatening amount) i do realise twas a little rude asking your avg without disclosing mine!.... so, to break even including purchase and sales fees, i'd need to sell at 48.54p (gotta love consolidations!)

my problem comes in that this is not the only share i hold that is underwater, granted this was the worst (still trading) but i hadn't considered it a worthwhile risk to add the small amount i do have spare to, considering others i hld and do need to avg down on more, same old merri-go-round really

@FrankieH what's ur avg here? if you don't mind me asking

nicely done Rev, i didn't have the funds when it was well down, and have been watching it the last week, and thought i might have missed it when it ticked up to 7... and got caught sitting on the sidelines not wanting to potentially tie what little funds i do have up in this, blew that decision lol

so i'm still well underwater because of the consolidation, and i'll need a long way from here still to break even :(

given the crap show parsons made at sound energy, i'd not be involved with ANYTHING he has a hand in, you'll get burned.

"Quite interesting to google their names in companies house and see what they're doing now....still holding directorships, or positions of chairman etc despite ill health/other interests/not being able to find a fart full of gas (yes that's for brian no gas mitchener)"

not surprising to see parsons involved with coro energy... that'll be why that one's share price is also in the toilet

i ended up with a handful of share sin that inleiu of a divi somewhere (might have been here) f'king useless, would cost me more in trading fee than their worth to sell them LOL

i'm carrying about an 8p avg here, just can't seem o justify trying to avg down.... feels like good money after bad

hoping for an update soon reference relisting, seems to have been pending for months and months, wish they'd give more info

yup,.... you did the hours for what you needed, you worked for that income... these dyas people want more for less, and seriously overvalue what they are worth.

the french model for reducing unemployment would have been based on the unemployed picking up the slack in relation to getting a job and covering those lost hours from existing workforce, that only works if you cut off their benefits, otherwise they just say crew it, i can get the same on benefits.

yup, and the french are considered lazy b**tards compared to a number of other countries when it comes to work ethic

oops, meant "thought that might be the case" not "think"

ok thanks i think that might be the case, it strikes me as a strange policy, in a time when industry needs to be fighting and striving to deliver for it's own survival, that the unions are trying to impose something that would affect that outcome by reducing productivity, although there is i am sure some thinking in there that the extra hours that would be needed to still complete the job would be overtime, which of course cuts into profits and then the operating fund you may have.

The more and more i see of union activity, the more i see it as a hindrance to business and an archaic left over remnant from state owned businesses, which turns into a millstone when the company is no longer state run. (which is funny, considering i am a member of one lol)

I hope not, i lost on BZM by failing to get out when the getting was good, and here i've struggled form the start

the reduction to the working hours per week, originally who was the driving force behind it, and why ? was it the staff, the unions, RM themselves trying to cut costs ?

that's not an unrealistic target, only thing which seems to be against the norm here, is that we're up and down a bit like a yo-yo, historically this has been a fairly stable ship (except around the brexit stuff!)