Jamie Bligh15 Feb 2018 13:00
sounds like he is 100% in Amits pocket, "we believe he is the best person to move the company forward"...... your "we" is no more nor less important than thre greater than 50% owned by PI's, and by "forward" do you mean further from PI's ability to recoup some of their lost money ?
first time i've come across his name, and my immediate impression is slimy f**ker
Tim was at the meeting to represent shareholders like myself, so, in short, wind your neck in Jamie.
I too have pretty much written this off as a complete loss, and only drop in here from time to time to see what the latest squabble is about, as far as i'm concerned PI's money was taken and wasted, and updates were fraudulent, everything else is smoke and mirrors ensure by whatever technicality they can not be prosecuted