Member Info for Crossthetea

Good to see the President of King Tide warning that their product is expensive then going on to immediately sell cheaper from another company separate from King Tide though what he is involved with.

Business 101, Derrick.

Re the takeover going bust, I suspect it was more to do with the threat of Cannaray being legally obliged to publish their results as a listed company in tough economic times ie. muddying their brand and BoD and making it more difficult to attract investment. At the time we were all only just realising how high the national inflation mountain actually was.

It would cost them more to list independently, so it just was not the right time for them, whatever they may have said about the share price. That excuse was a damp squib.

Quite an interesting article on the UN Climate report from last year, which sparked my interest in making a carbon capture portfolio. It is essential that GH gases are removed from the atmosphere, particularly due to emissions in the asian region.

This positions KingTide quite well, if they can demonstrate their tech and build some media attention.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/04/1048832/un-climate-report-carbon-removal-is-now-essential/

No knocking, just sarcasm, I'm a fan of the diversification. TBH, the Sephora channel is fine but KingTide is true long term thinking, a good move while the CBG market realises toward better economic times.

I'm just hanging in for Helena Christensen's carbon capture promotion.

Time to bail out boys, the 'Fool' is advising gold investment

https://www.fool.co.uk/2023/05/12/why-now-is-the-time-to-buy-gold-stocks-and-which-ones-to-invest-in/

I don't think we'll get to 20p on the back of a Sephora channel.

Carbon capture though. King Tide as a company is brand new, though the board is made from researchers with serious pedigree. I can see EXXON bidding 20p per share just for that part if they can disclose results, prove the tech and prove they are serious competitors. Where is the media though? We need a CEO shaking some trees and generating some publicity.

Though the common move is to buy as the price passes the threshold and as the warrants are made available to push the volume up and grow momentum for the share, because a good share price is a gold star on a Director's CV.

Though your explanation sounds more sinister. You're not paranoid if they are really after you, after all.

Ha! Called it! Though I do owe the CEO an apology, this is a goid, if not comolete curve ball of a, move.

There's money in C capture, i was actually in the middle of an investment plan for the same. I don't have to bother now.

Algae body wraps all round!

Are the planets aligning? Mark Bristow is hunting for takeover targets apparently, seeing the consolidation of the gold mining sector as a long-term strategic priority (FT article for all subscribed though the summarised version from a 3rd party site below)

https://www.ft.com/content/db1911e9-ac77-4176-8afc-3c6e266ef027

https://beamstart.com/news/barrick-gold-boss-hunts-for-16834325891394

It will likely end up in lloy, how boring. Another reason why London is my least favourite exchange.

My problem is that I cannot buy any shares. There's an obvious problem with liquidity.

Come on MMs, I have 40k burning a hole in my pocket here!

Also, where's the liquidity in this share? I made a few pounds on HUM that I want to let ride on CBX (call me a sucker, though I still hope that the market will realise how good CG products are at some point and reflect in volume) though I can't get a bid on anything. The MMs seem not to want my 40k, Mr Taylor should have a word with them.

When a CEO is this quiet I immediately suspect there's some large investment or takeover in the works. Though more likely Mr Taylor is just rubbish or sleeping or both, in this case.

Not the most eloquent of analyses I admit.

Highly likely I would say. A lockup would be used to prevent subjectivity upsetting the MM algorithms. They would open again once the position and market of the new company are better known.

Anyone who presents observation as conclusion is not a scientist. If they were serious about the study they would also measure the physiological changes (not just psychological ie placebo) from pain medication, EEG before/after or some other quantified dataset etc. They are looking for a quick headline, which is not science.

The conclusions from that study are actually quite dangerous. Because they claim the placebo SIGNIFICANTLY reduces the perception to pain, it calls into question the effectiveness of all pain medication and diagnosis of conditions causing pain.

We should never tell an MS sufferer to walk it off, as is what they are saying here essentially.

Wonderfully dangerous sensationalism. Remove their funding now.

Revenue shmevenue.

I'm more interested in the next pump and dump to allow whatever II is posting sell orders to sell. Though I do enjoy watching them squirm a little at these volume levels.

I'm pleading the fifth on that one Windows

Upside is we should not see a drop below 1.4 if that is what the sell order was made at.

So everyone just has to stop buying to drag the seller all the way to the RTO. Given the interest, shouldn't be too difficult ;)