Esmerelda13 Jul 2018 23:47
Yes of course. Illogical to call it misselling after the event. Just my expression for falsity in reality.
I and my family applied for over 350,000 shares. Ended up with 98000. That’s 28% where some other brokers offered 35% !!
WTF?
We tailswallowed and sold at between 15.5 and 16p . I didn’t expect 28% by any measure. There is an argument for caveat vendor/emptor in that there was risk. Ok yes.
One should take responsibility where due. I chose. But the issue is actually a false rns shareholder promise which was not fulfilled
I feel I have to take responsibility for inherent risk. I feelTrin should take resonsibility for failed promise. It is easy to moan but responsibility for own action ( self or company or anyone in any walk of life) is important. Trin should rectify failed promise.. I should admit I trusted the subscription too readily and invested too much. I have paid for that error . On the old pound note it used to say” I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of....” So should Trin.
Esmerelda...yes...there are indeed other places to put the returned cash...definitely!
I am looking at one or two. Namely one.Not AIM