Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
And tell them what? "Rms board have pulled my pants down again"?
0.5p incoming
Exactly and even then it will be missing parts
Only way this will get to 50p is if the machine starts printing magic beans and the way rms do business Thats probably the best chance
Well steveknownothin I'm glad turds float your boat
@neilmc are you really invested in this turd? Hahaha
Hi cheekyfishbit, great to have you on board, once the volunteers contract comes in we should see more than that
I know I laughed at the comment neilmc but can I ask if your actually invested?
Hahaha
So, bored on Sunday night I thought I'd do some reading... mainly EUA RNS's and I must say after having another read i really don't see what ammo the derampers have to throw at us investors. I dont mean to offend anyone but the people flapping must not have read or paid the required attention to them.
The latest tweet and the speculation on keeping WK 100% owned and mined and selling MT. The 1st July RNS states imo MT already had offers on the table. So you never know...
"All existing non-disclosure agreements interested parties have already signed with the Company in relation to the potential acquisition of the Monchetundra asset remain valid."
Also regarding the delays etc as stated in the same RNS...
"In relation to additional 25Moz (those resources in addition to the 15Moz of PGM in Monchetundra and its flanks) the information contained in the State Cadastre has not been independently verified by Eurasia and it is therefore provided for guidance purposes only. The Company would need to verify the data in the Russian Cadastre through additional work and drilling, if it was to incorporate the data into the defined resources of the Company (as required by the relevant mining standards and the AIM Rules). The Company may undertake such work as and when it is deemed necessary and, in any event, if it determines to progress with expanding the operations of the Company; building upon the data sets already established by previous licence holders."
Proving up the assets to ensure a higher company value may well be the reason as tbf if its there in the ground why wouldn't you want to prove it up? Its like giving away free money.
Current SP is irrelevant to me, its all there in the RNS's. Anyone unsure of their investment (which you shouldn't be as you chose to invest on your own research) I would advise to ignore all the bickering and read if you havnt done so or re read if you already have in the past but its been a while the cold hard FACTS in the RNS's
All imo GLA