RE: Chessmaster v MarketDealer22 Aug 2023 07:53
The cases that Chessmaster has highlighted were initiated earlier, considerably earlier, than rkh. They have blazed the trial, particularly in shredding the attempts at a sovereign immunity defence.
So on that basis the evidence would suggest the rkh case would, in contrast, sail through. Pioneers take the pain whilst the settlers that follow just prosper, and far quicker! History isn't something you replicate. In the real world History creates a path, which you then tread into a different future.
Having said that chessmaster's timescales are prob not far off though I'd guess a bit overstated. Important thing is what it means for the judgement calls on price, terms and conditions of those that might buy the case.