Member Info for CitizenTS

' naaaaa, Bonneville's what he himself calls a "greenie", just aching to tell people what to do.

Thanks MuchAM (re https://rockhopperexploration.co.uk/2016/01/drilling-update-1420-2-isobel-2-re-drill/ )

480 metres! One can sometimes forget.

Said before but that 4bln is the old "phase 1" ie, where there's an already defined development plan and an auditable vamuation. Doesn't include phase 2 or step-out stuff. Sea Lion as a field will be north of 2x that. And all of this is before even thinking about Isobel/Elaine or anything else.

Godawful shut up? We live in hope!

We're on our way

' well he already has returned to the bb under another alias as we all know

Thanks, very encouraging. Totally on track!

Think the 8USD 4bln is the old "phase 1" Sea Lion, what's going to be developed first, with the 8 Yr plateau etc. It's not "Sea Lion" in sense of all of it. Not phase 2, not step out potential in the vicinity or anything else

There we have it, godders was asked "are you not the same person" as aim investor and the answer was "No"! Two negatives there. Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings as they say ...

, godawful/overleveraged aim investor, face it, your just over committed here and p***ing yourself again today. LTT responded to your prodding for reassurance, no-one else could be bothered. Charitable is the word rather than polite!

Meant the dealers and their crew might think you're a seller. Madness I know but the spoofing rules protect them!!!

Careful getting those quotes, pipples get done for spoofing on less!!

@SH, yeay? Good to re.inf folk of this. Would add that the $8 per barrel cap ex has gone before forst oil (or is abandonment costs etc) so cash flow in your scenario is $63 per barrel. Also capital costs are a cost, inuding for tax purposes, so something like no tax till cap costs written off. Reckon cash flow to Rock in the scenario would be something like $350 million for a year of full production - though might usually say not quite 100% of production days and also there are rkh's office costs.

@snail, well done, those interviews etc are new news

'fraid godders is the only one around talking in terms of deadlines

Oh, so godders/aiminvestor is a conspiracy nut as well as accusing other posters of being corrupt. What a nice guy! If FID happens H1 '25 don't see anyone complaining - well except our newly resident conspiracy nut.

Overall picture is clear from Simon Thonson's optimism re a year from now. Tremendous.

How do you get the subtitles to be in English?

Surely the agreement to settle any tax due later (IF of course there is any) included Rkh trading normally in the meantime and was all TO ENABLE Sea Lion to happen. FIG need to keep to that agreement, not renege on Rkh trading normally in the meantime, and accept clarification of the wording to reflect the "meeting of minds" at the time of the agreement. That meeting of minds IS the contract that's actually in place. It presumably could be one interpretation of the existing wording. Simply needs clarification. All, as before, to enable SL including Rkh funding its equity share.

That's my tuppence worth for now!

Aaaaargh, spell check, "has to" , not history