We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
@Tobethebest
Because AIM is now infested with amateur traders who couldn't give a monkeys about they companies they're invested in. If they think there's going to be no news for a month, they'll sell. These days, trading platforms are just another branch of Paddy Power, inhabited by thickos.
What happened to the monthly investor calls that CC promised?
@wildtiger
How does the AI know whether Acacia is going to stump up the £3m it owes or whatever else BMN hasn't told the market?
He's probably still buying HZM.
I'd be interested to your rationale for buying BMN at this point. You'd get better odds playing a fruit machine.
Get the feeling the next RNS will say closure of operations. BMN cannot survive these prices and will be broken up, sold off and delisted.
What will precipitate a 44% rise in vanadium prices when China's property market is undergoing one of its worst slumps in modern history? Not VRFBs. Question is whether BMN can hang on until sentiment there China, but that's not a race it's likely to win.
Could BMN pivot to selling electrolyte at full capacity. No. It's struggling to get one or two customers to place orders. Problem being, China has its own supply and VFRFB uptake is almost non-existent outside of that region.
If you don't like wyndrum's posts scroll on by or shut up. He's not going to influence anyone if that's what you're afraid of.
Ordinarily I would expect directors to buy to show their commitment, but why should CC buy? He's clearing up FM's mess and there's nothing he can do at these vanadium prices other than asset strip the company. Why would anyone expect him to buy under those circumstances? If he saves BMN then implements a plan for growth that requires shareholder funding, I would expect him to back himself buy.
More pertinent question is whether we heading back to 2015 when V price was equivalent of $12.5 in China. I don't see the Chinese property market recovering for a decade. That's a lot of slack for VRFBs to take up - at the moment its 10% market share won't touch the sides.
V price in the US has dropped 20% since September and 38% since Feb last year. Catastrophic.
Would be nice if Coltman could explain how BMN survives these V prices. Yet to give a public interview and explain his rationale.
Even the loans are immaterial now, company is finished if prices don't turn significantly this year and there's no logical reason for that to happen with China's property crisis.
Only hope is if one of the V companies goes bust, but BMN is at the front of the queue.
Rather than throw insults, perhaps Mr one post and dbh1956dbh would like to provide an adult rationale for investing in this stock.
No, you're not a businessman. You've been giving us delivery numbers for years and the company has not been making a profit for years. So yeah, utterly meaningless unless of course the deliveries stop altogether. That would be a bad sign.
With V prices at this level there is no reason to buy and BMN are just kicking the debt can down the road. With the Chinese property market in ruins and more than enough V to sustain their own VRFB industry, it's not exactly looking good. What is the plan here? Craig has not communicated one and it feels like investors are being played.
"I still fully believe this is all one big shakeout ahead of the change in rebar standards for V content in China in 2025"
Isn't that supposed to be happening this month? Even if it happens it won't be a 2018 moment, the demand for steel is too low due to China's property crash.
"Green is there so every now and then the banker takes all and reset"
You've clearly never played roulette. 0 simply negates outside bets, giving the house a 5% edge.
deep state lool, give it a rest. liz truss destroyed her career because the markets got spooked by her disastrous £45bn unfunded tax cuts. she's finished as a politician in this country so needs to find a new way to make money out of gullible *******s like you.
if you genuinely think the game is rigged, do yourself a favour and sell up tomorrow.
oh, and 0 is on the roulette table because without it there's no point having a roulette table. prat.
The fury is not so much the raise , everyone knew it would come at some point, but how the SP was walked down for a fortnight and that certain investors have benefited at the expense of others. There is not just an air of incompetence in how this has been conducted, but impropriety, which not only erodes trust in Avacta but AIM as a market. People are sick of it.
From that perspective, somebody needs to be made an example of here, especially as the rumour mill and its subsequent affect on the SP pre-future raises, or predicted raises, are going to result in shareholder value being gutted by shorters and mired in contention again if the same people are doing the decision-making.
AS is too valuable to simply be removed completely, but he should be shifted sideways as nobody is going to believe a word he says ever again, which pretty much destroys any comms strategy the company may want to put in place. Just hoping this goes away isn't good enough IMO, even if the SP recovers in following months.
If you choose to gamble thousands on a binary decision, the only person to blame is yourself.