Member Info for chique

I happen to think Russian has a valid point not wanting nato to encroach on it's borders , god forbid Russia would put a base in scotland or mexico , you would then see how valid this makes Russia's argument as we would have 2 cuban style conflicts both from Uk and USA. The thing is russophobes do not see this as they have been so conditioned to think 'inside the box' that they were placed in from a young age.

I would also like to know the FULL COST to the UK , including all increased costs for people including fuel , food etc , because of sanctions , only to have Russia moving to number 5 position in world economies.

Deal to saudi arabia that is , the great example of human rights just like libya!!!

" terrorist campaigns "

You forgot to mention human rights like libya which is now destroyed on the back of human rights.

No , the west needs chaos in these countries to keep them in their place.

I read, have not confirmed, that USA is offering a nuclear weapons deal not to join BRICS, if this is true , it is pretty much inline with how that s hole of a country operates to maintain power.

" Hi BSR, I can show you photos of pootin shaking hands with far more murderous and callous regime leaders in the hope of securing arms and missiles for his dwindling stockpiles buddy, "

I would say the yanks and to a large extent western countries have been shown to be the most callous in history, recent history also, but western people like you do not value the vast number of civilians they have killed for power and money.

" Does anyone how what sales we need to brake even? "

I found Brians comments on this very strange saying there was NO breakeven due to processing costs, when we reach a point where fixed costs are paid this is normally breakeven , additional costs due to extra processing are normally taken into account as costs of production.

You are correct zcar , this does of course apply in both directions , we currently have miss laura trying to pump for a few pounds using targeted thread titles now that she is invested

We only managed to reach the last years target because of this aberration , that's if we count the 33k tons that were delivered one minute and not delivered the next.

" As it was a sales order only, it may be part of the 70k expected to be invoiced and delivered this year. "

Cannot see how that can be the case as the only figures we have in an RNS is

33k carried forward

16,755 q1 sales

3560 processed orders

Surely the 22k would get a mention as the 33k did

Yes the 22k was only a sales order , It really should have been invoiced as they had told us only invoices orders would be published.

This is the probelm as I see it , I thinbk having told us 'only invoiced' would be published , they are mixing and matching.

The 22k should still be in this year and is a considerable sum to lose or be tol;d we had when we never did.

Q1 2023 sales orders were only 16,755

so what happened to this 22k , which was part of the 172k for the year.

" They quote 100 year lom Chique so I'm not worried about that just yet "

Was this not on 85k tons though , also the costs go into the accounts affecting profit level / dividend . My point was that they changed the reporting of this when sales were better.

This was a statement in January RNS

" Brian McMaster, Chairman of Harvest, said: "2022 was another great year for Harvest, whereby we exceeded our ambitious sales order target of 150,000 tonnes KP Fértil, with total sales orders received reaching 172,000 tonnes, of which 150,000 tonnes was delivered and invoiced "

In the Final Results they said the 150,000 was actually only 117 as 33k tons were not delivered.

This year we are carrying 33k forward because of this

Why are we not carrying over an extra 22k tons , as sales orders total were 172k

so they should be carrying over the 33k and the 22k ? into this years revenue but they only ever mention the 33k

"Yes there are issues but the current situation is transient and will be rectified. How long? I don't know but IMHO this is an excellent entry point hence why I've just bought in. "

You may be right , I really am not sure if I am wanting to spend the time any more trying to work out what the companies RNS's mean , and concerned there will be a shock in the accounts , as they have the habit of slipping things in, such as the amount for end of mine rectification of site.

I was very lucky with this share as I had a substantial holding on the way up to 18p. I asked a friend to get a quote in Brasil , and the quote came back at 140 BRL when buying ten toneladas , it spooked me as the quote on HMI letterhead for 140BRL was whern we all thought it was in excess of 200 - 240 BRL , I sold down a considerable part of my holding because of this 'unknown' reason for the 140 BRL quote.

I subsequently bought and sold after that also down to 5p and then held on to 50k shares which I sold on the recent rise to 3.1 .

I have made significant profit for my trades but nothing like what I had planned to make when I first invested.

The reporting on this share has been as clear as mud with chopping and changing the reporting but using the same terms , such as sales orders invoiced , but they dont always use the term sales orders invoiced.

I really don't know what to expect here anymore , but for some time have wondered whether Brian is engineering this so as to take it private which would be his ideal scenario from what he has said , and also his partial contempt for shareholder detail.

" It is genuinely funny watching you all jumping up and down thinking a few mines has changed the course of everything and now it's all over and victory is confirmed. "

It is a shame this BB will end without seeing you come to terms with your inept analysis of this whole conflict, you should be embarrassed to have such a narrow view and so easily taken in.

May have been 12p , not 100% sure

Soto sold here at 16p and put his money into Nvidia at about 150 , hoping for 300 , they are now 468 !! great call

There is a lot I could say about dividends but you seem to want a concise appraisal from people who have taken the time to read the company's published documents.

Why have you not kept up to date for yourself?

We have had numerous RNS's referring to dividends and in addition it is mentioned in all the presentations