Member Info for chippyjo

Scarps, wouldn’t that be a form of market manipulation?
If that came out surely Schroeders would be in the du du. Someone surely was selling this down back in April and again a few months later.

Aimmillionaire funny how you never level that complaint at BB2….

Did the system ever receive EU certification?

Is there such a thing as bad sex?

BB if that was pointed at me, it was because he was making bond sound like a perennial Father Christmas. Years 19/20 were good to shareholders.
If you look back over the rns how much comes to fruition? Company does seem to have turned a corner but how long do shareholders keep saying it’s coming be patient?
Bond made some strong statements and as Oggs said in his post shareholders should have some expectations met. Except aimM of course, he’s happy to wait until the end of the millennium.

Bumble, look at the situation dec 16/17/18…
It’s more a statement of the fact rather than using hindsight to see where Afc are now.
I was hoping bond would come through late this year and the sales would start as long term holders deserve that.
Everyone’s an idiot until one day you find out they’re not. That’s a reply to eddyT by the way…

Phat, Bond has more of a track record of being the CEO equivalent of Scrooge at Christmas more often.

I just have to much time on my hands sometimes…
I’ll see where the company is in January and if Bond comes up with the goods.

Agree, that’s why I kept it as discussion on the company.
Money working well elsewhere thanks.

Cheeky, there are those investor who talk up the share irrespective of what the company do, and those that complain about the company when they feel the management have lost their way.
Who is better? There’s no answer to that but the metaphorical boot was put in after I sold for no other purpose ie buying in lower than being cheesed that the BOD didn’t keep financially patting themselves on the back when the results didn’t really in my view justify it.
The BOD are there to facilitate the company success for shareholders not milk it like a cow. That’s what they are paid for…
I can understand that shareholders feel aggrieved I changed my opinion but in reality I didn’t change my opinion on the company, but lost faith in having my money controlled by Bonds actions.
If you look, my negative posting at that time was not about product but management.
As for only holders being able to post, that’s delusional, much as believing the ultra positive posters here aren’t trading themselves.

Was an interview on TV where a hypothesis was that the Omicron version will infect many more to allow it to mutate. In that case the worry will be it mutates into a highly infectious killing variant.
Covidity may be needed urgently in such circumstances.

Has anyone compiled a list of the options Bond has as well as the shares already gifted?
Would be good to see how many he’s exposed to and whether the number is reasonable based of the subsequent performance?
Nice Santa rally today tho

Bumble, if you look at your reply to heath this really highlights the problem. Bond doesn’t leave himself in a position to be judged against milestone progress as the milestones are not defined in such a way.
But the financial side of things such as share options is written in a way there is no doubt. That’s why I think he’s bad for AFC.
Maybe he wasn’t the one instrumental in getting ABB on board?

To assess electrode longevity, AFC Energy initiated a long-term continuous operations test in August 2018. We are pleased to report that the first anniversary of the electrode operation has now been achieved. At this time, based on linear regression analysis from the test programme, there have been no significant adverse trends which would indicate that the four-year target life will not be met.
Did we meet this milestone? RNS 27/8/19

Yes Bumble, Ineos apparently did get a highly discounted energy price from their provider but the market has changed. Gas and electricity prices have spiked as has oil in the post Covid recovery, and car charging costs are on the rise as well.
Not meeting the previous market target reduces the marketability and hence income proposition form the L cell system.
As for the solid cell, nowhere near enough information has been released to make any judgements on it as a product in the same way the company have released next to nothing substantive about Alkamem

Bumble, that commercial requirement was based on the product in a baseload ClorAlk high power high availability regime. The ExE was not.
Place was not a required metric for the new product but then that would limit the application to intermittent power production.
There were plenty of shareholders wanting to know if the metrics based on the initial product positioning.
Place disappeared as the Ev charger launch required a less stressful working environment.
As your aware they never released the final longevity results unless I was on the moon that week.

He wins either way Aim, that’s the point.

And BB there was an expectation that the place requirements were to be met otherwise the electrode pairing process testing and evaluation would have been for nothing.
When a company sets parameters and meets the challenge, they should be shouting it from the rooftops. Shareholders have to dig to the depths of the Kola super deep borehole to find out what’s going on…

Bumble, place was quietly forgotten when the emphasis moved from baseload power generation from vented h2 to intermittent power generation with the EV charger. I’m not sure my facts are incorrect.
We never received the longevity results on the L cell so still have no idea what the overall longevity was. Now the emphasis has shifted again to the solid cell. Rand D again.
As I said ABB is a very useful partner if not the best but they’ll still want results.
Shipping, excellent if the R and D is successful but the vtol project, well I think that’s a bust as well as it being a freebie like ExE is turning out to be so far.
Investing in the stock market is about making money, many like myself have profit but the RNS guidance has been optimistic on too many occasions without the sales and technical results to back it up.
Alkamem?
L cell sales?
End of year report?
Multiple product launches?
Sorry to be a negative but investors rely on accurate reporting and good investor relations. Non of which can be said of the company in all the time I was invested.

Only a few weeks left in the year to release the long awaited news…
As for selling a small number units Aim, the reason this is a good thing is AFC as a company need real life on site data to validate real world service efficacy. Also this provides prospective customers a data set in the real world environment with regard to fuel cost, energy output and reliability. ExE was a showcase but is reality the running time is minuscule.
AFC are masters as building expectations, ClorAlk, vehicle charging, and we all remember the PLACE requirements….
Now Bond is talking solid cells, which fortunately for him provides another two years of excessive salary and perks along the way. The cell prototype hasn’t even been seen or validated.
ABB is the only thing beyond doubt as a good bet.
The world needs this technology for sure but all the time there are no sales, the utility companies continue to upgrade the network and alternative companies continue to prosper and add shareholder value.
Aim listed or not, the market needs to have faith in the words of the BOD to value it accordingly.
I also notice that the same as last time, jockmcsporren disappears when the drop in shareprice happens. He’ll be along soon to ramp it back up on the next trading rise while selling out at the top again.